Soldato
While the Speaker is listening to loons like this nutter, Ukraine is screwed.
Ukraine Invasion - Please do not post videos showing attacks/similar
- Thread starter areksnumbr1sxylady
- Start date
- Status
The speaker is a loon himself.. listening to loons, supported by more loons championing the king loon.
Unfortunately all in position of power.
Soldato
Yeah religious extremist. Sadly there are lots of them over there.
Even just reading a bit about the Avdiivka Coke Plant makes you see this started off in 2014
Avdiivka Coke Plant - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
Avdiivka Coke Plant - Wikipedia
Last edited:
Something else not often remembered by those who weren't following the topic at the time, is that the "separatists" actually managed to captured the Ukrainian city of Artemivsk in 2014. It was liberated by Ukranian forces later in 2014, and in 2016 it was renamed "Bakhmut".
That's why Russia was so obsessively focused on taking Bakhmut, because it was the only notable city captured by the "separatists" prior to the invasion and for them had something of a "we have to get this back at any cost to prove we're winning" factor.
Soldato
There are some unbelievably stupid Republicans around at the moment. These people are beyond crazy. Course, they will never find themselves on the front line, so what do they care?
Soldato
Just watched it. Man that is a tough watch
**** Putin and anyone who enables him or tries to both sides this. I hope he gets his one day and I hope its slow and very very painful 
No you said
"I can't think of a single Australian Prime Minister who's given an order for someone to be killed."
Which is a clear and obvious lie because they ordered many deaths.
Or again where those 26,000 soldiers there on a jolly and not killing anyone?
Last edited:
I'm just dipping back into the thread, but hasn't it already been clearly established that the specific question and relevant point was about leaders ordering the deaths of their domestic political opponents? Did anyone say that the challenge was to name a leader who hasn't ever authorised military action of any sort?
You'd think that but I said
"So say "no Australian pm has had a political rival assasinated" less dramatic sure but its actually accurate."
Which he disagreed with and said it again as a blanket statement so no.
Feel free to press the arrow button and see for yourself.
Last edited:
ISW is claiming that for the very first time in this war, Russia was able to provide close air support for ground troop assaults during the last 3 days in Avdiivka, indicating that Russia has achieved air superiority this location, which could be another sign that Ukraine has run out of ammunition
Last edited:
Soldato
I don't think this has been posted before, but Russia has started using a new Kh-69 cruise missile >> https://newsukraine.rbc.ua/news/russia-starts-using-new-kh-69-cruise-missiles-1708194578.html
Indeed lots of reports of airstrikes hitting, seems to have been a deciding factor for sure.
It's all going to come tumbling down without US aid and the EU ain't plugging the gap either.
But you know, under no circumstances can Russia win......we need to send more motivational quotes from our leaders to Ukraine, that'll help...
Ukraine war: Despite the standing ovations and vows of support, Zelenskyy's Western allies are falling short
Western partners are failing to turn their financial advantage into overwhelming firepower for Ukraine's outgunned troops on the frontline.
news.sky.com
Right, but now go back to the video that started the discussion. It was a direct question to Carlson that he didn't talk to Putin about :
"Freedom of speech in Russia, Navalnay, assassinations, restrictions on political opponents in the upcoming elections"
To which Tucker replied about all leaders kill people.
Now, in the context of the question being asked it's obvious the interviewer is asking about targeted assassinations of political opponents but Carlson is trying to paint the false equivalence that all killing is the same, that the obvious smooth brains try a run with as usual.
Unless of course you think say, killing someone in self defense is the same as killing someone on a murder spree.
So when Sankari and others talk about "I can't think of a single Australian Prime Minsiter who's given an order for someone to be killed."
They are using the word 'someone' as a specific person of importance [in the questions context of political assassination] not 'someone' as an unspecified anyone that you are taking the word to mean.
So the interpretation fail is on you. Now for someone like Roar, we know why he does it, but for you, I dunno, I guess it's just down to usual internet pedantry.
Caporegime
The <2 dozen Russians who bothered to protest Navalny's murder have been treated exactly as you'd expect.
Caporegime
No, you're still being dishonest. The operative word is 'someone' (i.e. a specific person) and the context is the assassination of Navalny.
As if your dishonesty wasn't bad enough, you don't even know how war works. It's fascinating.
Have you considered becoming a Trump supporter? You've got all the right qualities.
Caporegime
Yes.
No. Tefal is being dishonest, and doubling down on his dishonesty.
- Status