UN Migration Pact - Criticising Migration = Hate Crime

We often try to make the world better for our children, but according to something posted on PJW twitter a couple of weeks ago there are an awful lot of European leaders who have no children (May/Merkel/Macron/Junker/Sturgeon), and as such have no skin in the game so why should they care?

I never used to think the kids thing made any difference, but now I am changing my mind. So many of the leaders are childless, and it does make me wonder if their sheer narcissism and lack of familial values is playing a part in the shocking policy making.

How could Angela Merkel look a father of a raped and murdered 14/15 yr old German girl in the eye? How could she live with that?

Quite comfortably it seems.

That had never occurred to me before. But you're right. I'd assumed the current state of political parties was mainly due to an overwhelming number of them being career politicians with little real life experience. But now you point it out, you're right that many of them also don't have children. They are less likely to want to improve tomorrow for the benefit of their children and society and may be influenced more by what they can gain right now. Good point.
 
Its very true that so called leaders have no children.

I have brought my child up to the best I can and she is now starting to get bullied because she is so clever.

Should I have brought a dumb ass up to make her life easier.

These so called leaders of modern society are nothing more than a parasite on the human race.
 
You’re all wasting your breath, the UK has already confirmed they will be signing it.
Well if that's true then I'm really confused about May's stance on immigration given that she is adamant that she allegedly wants to end freedom of movement from the EU and curb immigration overall. Surely this is at odds with the Tory pledge of reducing immigration (which she did naff all about in the Home Office anyways) so why make things more difficult to deal with by signing the compact?
 
Last edited:
Well if that's true then I'm really confused about May's stance on immigration given that she is adamant that she allegedly wants to end freedom of movement from the EU and immigration overall. Surely this is at odds with the Tory pledge of reducing immigration (which she did naff all about in the Home Office anyways) so why make things more difficult to deal with by signing the compact?
...probably part of the amazing deal she's brought back from the EU.
 
Because she's a liar, she lies about the police, she lies about her achievements, she lies about Tory agendas that are not based in evidence, she lies about immigration and she lies about he Home Office.

Don't expect anything other than smug "I'm a Prime minister now" from this anachronism.
 
Because she's a liar, she lies about the police, she lies about her achievements, she lies about Tory agendas that are not based in evidence, she lies about immigration and she lies about he Home Office.

Don't expect anything other than smug "I'm a Prime minister now" from this anachronism.

If she hadn't decimated the police and had actually done something to address peoples' concerns over immigration years back then I reckon we wouldn't be enduring this total shower right now. :D
 
If this is a plan to make illegal immigration acceptable and that is what world leaders want then they are basically calling for Balkan style wars to breakout.

I can imagine at some point native people will not be accepting of the pace of change and will want to preserve their families historical homeland for their own children. Look at the bother between Israel and Palestine for what happens when a people want their own place to call home.

Scary times ahead I feel...
 
If she hadn't decimated the police and had actually done something to address peoples' concerns over immigration years back then I reckon we wouldn't be enduring this total shower right now. :D
Agreed. I blame both Labour and the Tories for it. They opened the door to greater immigration and simultaneously cut budgets to key services. People are utterly fed up with it now. Brexit, a backlash over immigration and a general swing to the right are the, very predictable, results.
 
Agreed. I blame both Labour and the Tories for it. They opened the door to greater immigration and simultaneously cut budgets to key services. People are utterly fed up with it now. Brexit, a backlash over immigration and a general swing to the right are the, very predictable, results.

Swing to the right? Corbyn will be the next PM...
 
Swing to the right? Corbyn will be the next PM...
I'm talking about many of the population in the UK and across Europe swinging to the right politically. Corbyn may well be the next PM (God help us). But that's because the Conservatives have self imploded.
 
Federal world its the only way we can survive as a species, finite resource and all that, better to start this arguments now rather than later, makes perfect sense tbh. But then when has a fact based system been of use politically.

I am looking forward the to the killing people off when they are 80 argument as its a drain on society......
 
That had never occurred to me before. But you're right. I'd assumed the current state of political parties was mainly due to an overwhelming number of them being career politicians with little real life experience. But now you point it out, you're right that many of them also don't have children. They are less likely to want to improve tomorrow for the benefit of their children and society and may be influenced more by what they can gain right now. Good point.

There is a strong thread of truth throughout it. Leaders with no children can never understand a particular depth of human emotion that comes from having children. They are totally devoid of that feeling precisely because they do not have children.

I would kill and die for my children. They would never know an emotion as powerful (unless of course their propensity for greed and control reaches those dizzying heights).

Maybe a law saying you must have children to be a PM or President wouldn't be such a bad idea. It would be interesting to compare the MPs and what percentage have children vs those who don't and contrast that with national averages.
 
Back
Top Bottom