Associate
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
All scores updated.
@Vega
Very nice score
Could you confirm your CPU and GPU clocks please.
win 7 64bit
i5 3570k at 4ghz
8gb ddr3
msi 670 power edition non oc version using 324.22 drivers
Heaven benchmark just done. My 3570k is at 4ghz so a mild oc on my cpu, no oc on the gpu tho its just stock.
Max temp was about 70 on the gpu but that was right at the end of the test.
Is that a good result?
Oh and heres a gpuz of my 670 showing its boost.
My i7 920:4.305ghz / Toxic 6950 Dual Bios > 950/1350MHz.
Somehow seems fishy.
4 GPUs
1. Score 5203, GPU nvTitan x 4, @995/1727, CPU 3930k @5.1, Kaapstad
2. Score 5195, GPU nvTitan x 4, @1176/1812, CPU 3960X @5.2, Vega
Any ideas why my score isnt beating a guy called kierans score when his 3570k isnt overclocked and mine is at 4ghz and i boost more than him on the gpu front as in he does 1136 and i do 1149?
http://forums.overclockers.co.uk/showpost.php?p=24334917&postcount=823 His post btw.
His min fps is 17fps mine is 7fps, his max fps is 77 mine is 75. I think he is using a newer drive than me but thats about it. I think from checking the numbers on his screenie he is using 320.18 drivers and im using 314.22
Not complaining as such just confused how his score was more than mine when i had the better specs? Tho could be "just" the driver i dunno. Somehow seems fishy.
Hi, what the **** TGA file, thank god for free apps fastviewer.
i7 920:4.405ghz / GPU - Toxic 6950/70 Dual Bios:950/1350MHz