Associate
@silversurfer
The 8800 GTX was truly a beast. I had been on AMD GPU prior that, it lasted well. TBH I can't recall another recent GPU which held it's own for as long as it did for me out of all of GPU purchases.
VEGA has interesting features for sure. The HBCC allowing other 'data storage areas' to be used for VRAM is something good for longevity. But on saying that it really doesn't matter to some degree how much VRAM a GPU has. In that it will reach a point in it's life cycle where the FPS delivered by the GPU is showing the age of the GPU more than how much VRAM it can address. How much the other features on VEGA impact performance is pretty much down to how well they get implemented and widely used. If they don't get used it becomes a moot point. Which at this moment AMD really should have had enabled and been able to show case to make a solid case for prospective buyers not consider an alternative, as I have done. This would have also lead to less 'flack' from all sides for the delay to come up with VEGA.
The VRM on VEGA is great, it was great on Fiji as well, did it allow a better OC? nope.
Dual bios is moot point IMO on VEGA, the extra 'Security Feature' means true bios mod is not viable on VEGA. Yeah we can say "Oh hark I got extra performance by flashing my V56 with a V64 bios". To someone as OCD as me I'd wanna be using the right VBIOS for ASIC and have the facility to mod data values as I want. I did this on Hawaii and Fiji, in each case, in my experience it was always a more stable experience for gaming, length f@h runs, where I modded the right VBIOS for GPU. As example the ASIC profiling on Fiji Pro for VID per DPM was differing to Fiji XT. I have not yet looked at that portion of the VBIOS of VEGA, but would not be surprised if it differs. Due to this lack of true bios mod, it meant I couldn't discount going to the competitor.
I would agree that FreeSync is the main aspect that wants me to find a VEGA at the price I'd like.
The 8800 GTX was truly a beast. I had been on AMD GPU prior that, it lasted well. TBH I can't recall another recent GPU which held it's own for as long as it did for me out of all of GPU purchases.
VEGA has interesting features for sure. The HBCC allowing other 'data storage areas' to be used for VRAM is something good for longevity. But on saying that it really doesn't matter to some degree how much VRAM a GPU has. In that it will reach a point in it's life cycle where the FPS delivered by the GPU is showing the age of the GPU more than how much VRAM it can address. How much the other features on VEGA impact performance is pretty much down to how well they get implemented and widely used. If they don't get used it becomes a moot point. Which at this moment AMD really should have had enabled and been able to show case to make a solid case for prospective buyers not consider an alternative, as I have done. This would have also lead to less 'flack' from all sides for the delay to come up with VEGA.
The VRM on VEGA is great, it was great on Fiji as well, did it allow a better OC? nope.
Dual bios is moot point IMO on VEGA, the extra 'Security Feature' means true bios mod is not viable on VEGA. Yeah we can say "Oh hark I got extra performance by flashing my V56 with a V64 bios". To someone as OCD as me I'd wanna be using the right VBIOS for ASIC and have the facility to mod data values as I want. I did this on Hawaii and Fiji, in each case, in my experience it was always a more stable experience for gaming, length f@h runs, where I modded the right VBIOS for GPU. As example the ASIC profiling on Fiji Pro for VID per DPM was differing to Fiji XT. I have not yet looked at that portion of the VBIOS of VEGA, but would not be surprised if it differs. Due to this lack of true bios mod, it meant I couldn't discount going to the competitor.
I would agree that FreeSync is the main aspect that wants me to find a VEGA at the price I'd like.