FWIW I get the same ping on VM as I do Vodafone/cityfibre
ping -i 0.5 1.1.1.1
in a terminal and then launch an Ubuntu torrent download (i.e. saturate your line) and watch the numbers fly on VM. Or (better), run an RRUL test in Flent and compare. They are not the same. In MyVM page it only shows that option to upgrade....even if I click the welcome to volt section it goes to same page unless it's somewhere else?
Runping -i 0.5 1.1.1.1
in a terminal and then launch an Ubuntu torrent download (i.e. saturate your line) and watch the numbers fly on VM. Or (better), run an RRUL test in Flent and compare. They are not the same.
ping -t 1.1.1.1
would be better, trying to use a TTL (-i = TTL, not interval) of 1 is not going to give you anything of use.While I appreciate the post (really) and tbh I should have known better... Look at my sig. What I posted is correct on any proper OS like *BSD, Linux or macOS, where -i is interval and -t is TTL. I'm assuming -i = TTL is a Windows thing?Runningping -t 1.1.1.1
would be better, trying to use a TTL (-i = TTL, not interval) of 1 is not going to give you anything of use.
Hear hear.What I posted is correct on any proper OS like *BSD, Linux or macOS
While I appreciate the post (really) and tbh I should have known better... Look at my sig. What I posted is correct on any proper OS like *BSD, Linux or macOS, where -i is interval and -t is TTL. I'm assuming -i = TTL is a Windows thing?
They weren't, VM did better.Runping -i 0.5 1.1.1.1
in a terminal and then launch an Ubuntu torrent download (i.e. saturate your line) and watch the numbers fly on VM. Or (better), run an RRUL test in Flent and compare. They are not the same.
12 vs 13? Who gives a ****That’s not the same ping though.
Ignoring the random single 45ms response on fibre, it's performing much better than VM. There's a 10ms deviation compared to over double that number on Virgin Media.12 vs 13? Who gives a ****
What speeds do people on M500 actually get ? just wondering, I'm currently on 350 but seem to be connected at around 390 ish all the time.
…and the line wasn’t even actually loaded!Ignoring the random single 45ms response on fibre, it's performing much better than VM. There's a 10ms deviation compared to over double that number on Virgin Media.
That's a nicely made vid (genuinely), and FTTP is always going to rule. As I said earlier though, do note that unless you're saturating your line both ways with hundreds of connections (think torrents, Tor, servers) you won't really start to separate the men from the boys. People with VM lines doing what you posted and sayingHere's mine, Vodafone FTTP via CityFibre aswell:
Bare in mind I have absolutely no QoS going on.
Running a network stress test on an OS few people use isn't real world though.That's a nicely made vid (genuinely), and FTTP is always going to rule. As I said earlier though, do note that unless you're saturating your line both ways with hundreds of connections (think torrents, Tor, servers) you won't really start to separate the men from the boys. People with VM lines doing what you posted and saying
are missing the point. Go to flent.org and follow the instructions to run an rrul test. On your line, you'll be fine. I'd encourage everyone who said their VM lies are great to do an actual real world test like that and report back with the graph and data files, though.
That's a nicely made vid (genuinely), and FTTP is always going to rule. As I said earlier though, do note that unless you're saturating your line both ways with hundreds of connections (think torrents, Tor, servers) you won't really start to separate the men from the boys. People with VM lines doing what you posted and saying
are missing the point. Go to flent.org and follow the instructions to run an rrul test. On your line, you'll be fine. I'd encourage everyone who said their VM lies are great to do an actual real world test like that and report back with the graph and data files, though.