Thanks for the quick replyOnly the port connected to your own router will work, none will work for LAN. Yes you’d need a cable router.
Thanks for the quick replyOnly the port connected to your own router will work, none will work for LAN. Yes you’d need a cable router.
As ChirsD says and you'll want to connect to LAN port 4 on the SH5 as that is the 2.5Gb one.probably a stupid question thinking of getting my own router for my hub 5, are all ports on the hub disconnected in modem mode and do i need a cable modem rather than an adsl one ?
Thanks
Unfortunately my server is connected to that port. So if I was going for a router to attach to the hub 5 with 2.5gb ports any recommendations?As ChirsD says and you'll want to connect to LAN port 4 on the SH5 as that is the 2.5Gb one.
When the SH5 is in modem mode thats the only port that is active.Unfortunately my server is connected to that port. So if I was going for a router to attach to the hub 5 with 2.5gb ports any recommendations?
Thanks I understand so any routers recommend that have more than one 2.5G.b port only for WiFi as everything for speed is hard wiredWhen the SH5 is in modem mode thats the only port that is active.
You will need to connect your server to the (new) router and the router to the port the server is currently using on the SH5
Unfortunately my server is connected to that port. So if I was going for a router to attach to the hub 5 with 2.5gb ports any recommendations?
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder!You paid that amount of money for that ugly thing?
Haha! I keep looking at the GL.NET Flint 2. It's adored on the OpenWRT boards; it's very fast, supported by mainline Linux and vanilla OpenWRT (but ships with a custom OpenWRT and Luci ootb). It will do symmetric 2.5Gbps with SQM and gigabit WireGuard(!) in its sleep, using around 2% to 3% CPU usage under full load with hw_offload. But, I just... can't get over the looks though. If they did it in a basic wired version I'd have bought it weeks ago.You paid that amount of money for that ugly thing?
I feel like a broken record on here, but yep. Asus, your bargepole, etc etc. A Flint 2 or Topton N100 based unit running OpenWRT/VyOS/*Sense is half the price and twice the performance, with actual updates and support. I have to give it to Asus' marketing department, though. if only they shared a budget with the actual dev team!I'd rather that than put money in Asus' pockets. At least you know that they'll care about consumer security!
Yup, combined with Deco WiFi if mesh is your thing, or there's the UniFi road (which I'm on and more than happy with).I feel like a broken record on here, but yep. Asus, your bargepole, etc etc. A Flint 2 or Topton N100 based unit running OpenWRT/VyOS/*Sense is half the price and twice the performance, with actual updates and support. I have to give it to Asus' marketing department, though. if only they shared a budget with the actual dev team!
The router's developer team is testing firmware with MediaTek's closed-source drivers to see if they resolve the low speed issue in 2.4 GHz and other functions. If anyone wants to test:
I haven't been burgled yet (*touch wood*), but I still buy doors that have working locks... Yeah the 2.4GHz issue is there, but the OpenWRT snapshot seems to be making good progress. Basically anything but old printers and IoT is 5GHz these days, anyway, and that works great. I would never advise an all-in-one to begin with, personally. I'm currently looking at the TP-Link ER8411 (dual 10G SFP+ with eight 1G RJ45) and similar, but tbh I'll probably just end up building my own again.I understand why you networking cognoscenti are down on Asus routers. Though to us lesser mortals we've used them for years and not had any real issues. I get excellent range on mine.
Unless you're a network guru like Rainmaker I probably wouldn't advise getting the Flint 2 just yet as it's so new and still seems to have some teething issues.
XGS-PON from VM is every bit as good if not better than Openreach GPON. However, you still have to deal with VM!Ive always heard fairly mixed results about virgin and their hubs and just generally their service. However Ive just seen I can get 1000/1000 from them (2000/2000 too expensive for me) for less than my 900/100 from aquiss. But dont want to move if pings will increase and be less stable. Anyone on the new XGS-PON service? Any difference?
My main issue is Im not sure which bit of the network people complain about, I know the hubs arent brilliant but once the hub5x has modem mode I guess most of that disappears. But if the issues is. deep within virgins routing etc then connection to house wont help me at all. I think Im going to wait to see what/if anything happens with Openreach providers pricing when 1.8gb is properly launched in April.XGS-PON from VM is every bit as good if not better than Openreach GPON. However, you still have to deal with VM!
Most of the issues are related to oversubscription and ageing HFC infrastructure. However their XGS-PON is full fibre, and it's excellent. Given the choice I'd be on that over Openreach FTTP.My main issue is Im not sure which bit of the network people complain about, I know the hubs arent brilliant but once the hub5x has modem mode I guess most of that disappears. But if the issues is. deep within virgins routing etc then connection to house wont help me at all. I think Im going to wait to see what/if anything happens with Openreach providers pricing when 1.8gb is properly launched in April.
Left Virgin a few years ago when FTTP was active in my area, never looked back.
Bye bye Virgin it's been emotional, hello Aquiss (FTTP) (look at that ping/latency!)