Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Ignoring the whole cards are more expensive this gen argument.
It just needed to be $800 in the first place. I can't see how it was acceptable to be only $100 below the 7900XTX unless they knew the latter would never in reality be $999.
What's then happened is they've given the space for nvidia to undercut them on launch. The 7900xtx was positioned correctly at $200 below the 4080 and look how it is selling.
Actually its not the worst 4090, there are many that are worse, for example gigabyte windfury. But i agree, its a huge letdown compared to the 3090.Since the Gamerock 4090 OC Palit have done a bait-and-switch on the quality of the PCB components vs 30x0 series. These newer 40x0 Palits PCB's have the worst components of any Nvidia card.
Can't wait to see the Buildzoid breakdown of this turkey.
Buy a TUF instead.
Yea because Cryptocurrencies didn't exist before Eth according to you, give me a break, you were just as bad with reading comprehension on the Hexus forums, you've learnt nothing.
What information would you like honey bun. What I've already posted pretty much covers it, maybe you'd like to try reading it before replying next time.
that wont address the issue.. what you need is a segmental breakup of gross margins..I suspect nothing short of Zeus coming down from Mt Olympus and telling them personally will convince the people who believe cryptocurrency is not what's pushed up the prices of GPUs, however while it's certainly not conclusive it's also no coincidence IMO. If you go further back to when cryptocurrency was not a thing, so before 2010, i think you'll find 10-30% profit margins (IIRC as my google-fu is letting me down on finding details that far back) were the norm.
Since the Gamerock 4090 OC Palit have done a bait-and-switch on the quality of the PCB components vs 30x0 series. These newer 40x0 Palits PCB's have the worst components of any Nvidia card.
Can't wait to see the Buildzoid breakdown of this turkey.
Buy a TUF instead.
That's not from gaming GPU's though, is it? As far as I know most of nvidias income is not from the gaming segmentIts quite funny when the proof that Nvidia profit margin has been climbing since 2010 - then when it first went over 50% and hasnt dropped since.
herp derp miners huh
NVIDIA Profit Margin 2010-2024 | NVDA
Current and historical gross margin, operating margin and net profit margin for NVIDIA (NVDA) over the last 10 years. Profit margin can be defined as the percentage of revenue that a company retains as income after the deduction of expenses. NVIDIA net profit margin as of October 31, 2024 is...www.macrotrends.net
That's not from gaming GPU's though, is it? As far as I know most of nvidias income is not from the gaming segment
i think nvidia's gaming operating margins must be higher than those reported by enterprise BU but GMs are reversed.. thats because the enterprise biz must be absorbing higher than proportionate fixed costs, which looks like a reasonable scenarioThat's not from gaming GPU's though, is it? As far as I know most of nvidias income is not from the gaming segment
I don't disagree, it's why i said IMO crypto pushed up prices rather than something like we're only paying higher prices because of it. What i dispute are the lines spouted out by what are essentially the equivalent of flat-earthers, that mining has not contributed to price inflation when anyone with more than no eyes see something like this...that wont address the issue.. what you need is a segmental breakup of gross margins..
because enterprise uptake is also more like a recent affair, i think kepler put them on an accelerated trajectory, wasnt it the first gpu with fp64 registers or something?
but i think the entire supercomputing and datacenter gig mustve reached critical mass maybe not before 2015-16.. i dont have the numbers but thats what i estimate from news flow and mgmt commentary
so it is probably not just crypto driving up margins.
edit: lol looks like cuda was first released on June 23 2007.. so maybe i am off the mark by 3-5 years
that wont address the issue.. what you need is a segmental breakup of gross margins..
because enterprise uptake is also more like a recent affair, i think kepler put them on an accelerated trajectory, wasnt it the first gpu with fp64 registers or something?
but i think the entire supercomputing and datacenter gig mustve reached critical mass maybe not before 2015-16.. i dont have the numbers but thats what i estimate from news flow and mgmt commentary
so it is probably not just crypto driving up margins.
edit: lol looks like cuda was first released on June 23 2007.. so maybe i am off the mark by 3-5 years
This starts from the premise that we "have to buy" something in the first place.I don't think anyone is saying matching last year's price/perf is acceptable. That doesn't mean you shouldn't buy them. If they weren't released at all, you'd have to buy the older cards with older features.
Compared to AMD was great and still is since the red team only now equals it. But it "sucks" against next gen from Nvidia, as in being far behind.So you say the RTX 3090 `sucks` in RT? Impressive.
This starts from the premise that we "have to buy" something in the first place.
If you have a 3070 and need better performance, you 'have to buy' a newer card. If you have a 2080 ti and want better performance, you need to buy something.
You don't get performance for free.
If your logic is you don't need to buy something, then the price is completely irrelevant. You shouldn't be buying a new card which will then immediately depreciate if your current card was fine.
Gordon Moore begs to differ.You don't get performance for free.