[TW]Fox;13598807 said:The Aston Martin V12 Vantage is no Mk2 Golf![]()
[TW]Fox;13598807 said:I just think its too much of a co-incidence that you also happen to own one.
Is the rallye not a GTI with some more plastic glued on to it and wide arches? You can't say it's the most beautiful car ever, come on, just admit it!
Because god forbid someone ignored common sense and got something they WANT.![]()
Because god forbid someone ignored common sense and got something they WANT.![]()
I understand what you are saying, and that's fine. But I don't need "credibility" for my opinion now do I? Especially since the topic has nothing to do with sensibility or how good a particular car is.
But if it makes you happy its closely followed by an Shelby Mustang 500
Not far off, but its about beauty not technical side of things.![]()
Technical, clinical and beautiful don't go together.
Technical and clinical in a different sense than the mk2. The golf was always function first and form second, it wasn't designed to be a beautiful car, just a family hatchback
I'm pretty sure it was also designed to look nice as well though. Also is it not conceivable that as an accident of function over form a beautiful object was created?
shelby GT 500
![]()
[TW]Fox;13598921 said:Wow, I'm not sure its possible for somebody to miss the point in a more spectacular fashion than you have![]()
300SL Gullwing for me as well.
No, I agree.Am I the only one who thinks E-Types are utterly hideous?![]()
For example I often think the Peugeot 406 Coupé is a beautiful looking car, but most people won't agree with me because it's a mass produced Peugeot