The 'why buy a new car when you can buy a used car' argument has been going since cars were invented though.
And why would anyone buy a used Tesla when a 10 year old Mondeo would do for a lot less. This isn’t about value, because relative value has always been a thing.
Why pay more for an Audi when you can get a Hyundai? Why buy an iPhone when a cheap Chinese android will do?
That wasn’t an unexpected response but only made up 1/3 of the of the post. Value is a huge consideration when buying a car.
The first part of the post was a comparison to much cheaper ICE vehicles which frankly offer far better value.
The last part of the post was the £lol depreciation on them.
The MX-30 offers such poor value. It doesn’t matter which was you look at it.
It’s certainly a new car to buy if you don’t like money.
You can argue the relative merits on the value of an MX-30 but what you can’t argue is there is a much bigger market for short range EVs than there is for long range EVs.
I’m not really sure there is.
If you classed short range as 150-180 miles then sure I could get behind that.
Given how few of these ‘100’ mile (inc the Honda E) they’ve actually sold in the last few years, I’d suggest people don’t actually want them and would prefer something with a bit more range like the Mokka or Mini Electric.
Remember the market is what people want to buy, not what they need to buy.
In the longer term I could see shorter range EVs having a bit of a resurgence but that’s only because there will be the infrastructure to support it (e.g. ubiquitous availability of AC destination charging) and smaller batteries that can be rapid charged faster.
But until those two points are sorted, which let’s be honest will be some time away, I just can’t see a mass market for £30k 100 mile range cars.