• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

When the Gpu's prices will go down ?

Soldato
Joined
20 Aug 2019
Posts
3,035
Location
SW Florida
I think it's easy to get into the weeds with the internal workings of these companies.

It all boils down to the products they offer us and the money they want us to exchange for those products.

How does it perform?

What does it cost?

Their job is to offer products we want at prices we will pay.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
9 Nov 2009
Posts
24,982
Location
Planet Earth
Nvidia has constantly higher Gross GAAP margins than Apple and many Big Oil and Big Pharma companies. People need to stop giving two ***** about their costs.
I think it's easy to get into the weeds with the internal workings of these companies.

It all boils down to the products they offer us and the money they want us to exchange for those products.

How does it perform?

What does it cost?

Their job is to offer products we want at prices we will pay.
Big Oil made losses at the start of the Pandemic because Oil prices went negative so should we give a toss when the same companies now jack up prices? Nope. Does anyone give a damn about the margins of a shop and it's suppliers when you go and do your weekly shop? Nope. Would you think of OcUK margins if you get a product half the price of other competitors? I doubt it. Customers have to think about their own margins and pockets instead of thinking about these foreign owned tech companies, who get propped up by their own taxpayers.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
19 Oct 2008
Posts
5,956
Cash oil didn't go negative. Can look at the history of Brent Crude to see that. But yes low prices impacted oil companies at the time as breakeven was something like $30 per barrel. Brent Crude went to a low as $16 but didnt stay there long.
Oil went negative on the futures markets because demand had just evaporated very quickly and traders & others were then stuck holding the futures contracts. As they were future contracts, when the contract expires delivery has to be taken of the underlying asset or commodity in this case. So,prices went negative as it meant those holding the contracts had to pay someone to take these contracts off their hands otherwise they'd have had to take delivery of the oil. Speculators especially wouldn't want 5000 barrels of oil being delivered to their home.

Agrreed,customers shouldn't give a damn about their costs, just whether you want the product, can justify it etc, or not.

NVidia are in such a position to be able to control the market. Tesla was the same a while ago. We'd all do the same as Nvidia if we ran such a business too. They know their market well

We can only speculate on why NV seems to have steered customers towards the 4090 this gen as the others are naf for the price :D
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Posts
7,107
Cash oil didn't go negative. Can look at the history of Brent Crude to see that. But yes low prices impacted oil companies at the time as breakeven was something like $30 per barrel.
Oil went negative on the futures markets because demand had just evaporated very quickly and traders & others were then stuck holding the futures contracts. As they were future contracts, when the contract expires delivery has to be taken of the underlying asset or commodity in this case. So,prices went negative as it meant those holding the contracts had to pay someone to take these contracts off their hands otherwise they'd have had to take delivery of the oil. Speculators especially wouldn't want 5000 barrels of oil being delivered to their home.

Agrreed,customers shouldn't give a damn about their costs, just whether you want the product, can justify it etc, or not.

NVidia are in such a position to be able to control the market. Tesla was the same a while ago. We'd all do the same as Nvidia if we ran such a business too. They know their market well

We can only speculate on why NV seems to have steered customers towards the 4090 this gen as the others are naf for the price :D
Are yields not as good as expected so they want to sell fewer cards at higher profits? Did they anticipate lower demand and don't want to get stuck with a lot of stock again or is there just so much of the previous gen they have to shift them and are willing to sacrifice some of this gen to clear out?
 
Soldato
Joined
1 Nov 2002
Posts
10,249
Location
Sussex
Nvidia has constantly higher Gross GAAP margins than Apple and many Big Oil and Big Pharma companies. People need to stop giving two ***** about their costs.

I don’t care about their costs, I’m just pointing out things have got more expensive and you can’t ignore that as a contributor. Sometimes it isn’t all black or white, though clearly Nvidia have prioritised their massive margins at the expense of the consumer, but they can because they are essentially unchallenged.
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Oct 2008
Posts
5,956
Are yields not as good as expected so they want to sell fewer cards at higher profits? Did they anticipate lower demand and don't want to get stuck with a lot of stock again or is there just so much of the previous gen they have to shift them and are willing to sacrifice some of this gen to clear out?
Could be related to some or all of those points. My guess is around potentially predicted lower demand given the economic conditions and just maybe they weren't sure of any ongoing supply issues so goal to to make more profit selling less this generation knowing the real hardcore gamers will find a way to buy the top end GPU especially.

I've made the decision not to buy anything this generation but not going to moan about NV either. IMO it's up to them what they charge.
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
27 Sep 2008
Posts
1,424
..though clearly Nvidia have prioritised their massive margins at the expense of the consumer, but they can because they are essentially unchallenged.
I initially read that as "unhinged".

Mind you, going by Nvidia's terrible sales recently, maybe that is the case. :)
 

TNA

TNA

Caporegime
Joined
13 Mar 2008
Posts
28,518
Location
Greater London
Nvidia has constantly higher Gross GAAP margins than Apple and many Big Oil and Big Pharma companies. People need to stop giving two ***** about their costs.

Big Oil made losses at the start of the Pandemic because Oil prices went negative so should we give a toss when the same companies now jack up prices? Nope. Does anyone give a damn about the margins of a shop and it's suppliers when you go and do your weekly shop? Nope. Would you think of OcUK margins if you get a product half the price of other competitors? I doubt it. Customers have to think about their own margins and pockets instead of thinking about these foreign owned tech companies, who get propped up by their own taxpayers.

I don't give two ***** about their costs or AMD's. They price it too high, I simply skip a gen and go with whoever does better next time.

Sure having the best is nice. But what exactly am I missing out on in my Steam library by only having a 3080 Ti? Cyberpunk PT? I think I will be fine :cry:

They could have had my money had they gone £749 on the 4080. But they chose not to. Money stays in my wallet :D
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Nov 2009
Posts
24,982
Location
Planet Earth
I don’t care about their costs, I’m just pointing out things have got more expensive and you can’t ignore that as a contributor. Sometimes it isn’t all black or white, though clearly Nvidia have prioritised their massive margins at the expense of the consumer, but they can because they are essentially unchallenged.

Well if you don't care about there costs,going on "but! but! their costs are higher! So it justifies their price increases".As a buyer this is irrelevant to my purchasing decisions.They are not some struggling business.

What I see is they can make higher Gross Margins than many companies such as Apple,Big Oil,Big Pharma who constantly get called out for this and those companies also invest billions too. Nobody cares. You can see that in the realworld.

The US taxpayer already helps Nvidia out,like AMD and Intel. Nvidia paid zero Federal taxes in 2018:

AMD gets supercomputer contracts from the US government:

The CHIPS Act helps all of them with billions of USD of US taxpayer funds:

So let the US taxpayer care about "their problems" as I don't care. AMD years ago was on the brink of bankruptcy - were people saying they "needed" to increase prices XYZ? Or Intel is struggling now to compete with AMD and their margins have gone down massively? Are people saying they "need" to increase prices XYZ?

The only people who keep saying they are justified in doing so are PCMR uberfans. PCMR never used to be this way decades ago. Had some AMD guys trying it on with the Zen3 and Zen4 price hikes. This is Apple level nonsense. Apple uberfans kept making XYZ excuses why the products were getting more expensive,had more stingy specifications,etc.

But even Apple uberfans have had enough:

So if the Apple fanbase have had enough,what is PCMR then? Worse than Apple uberfans?

I don't give two ***** about their costs or AMD's. They price it too high, I simply skip a gen and go with whoever does better next time.

Sure having the best is nice. But what exactly am I missing out on in my Steam library by only having a 3080 Ti? Cyberpunk PT? I think I will be fine :cry:

They could have had my money had they gone £749 on the 4080. But they chose not to. Money stays in my wallet :D

Just see my reply above. The US taxpayer throwns tons of money at these companies like charities,so why should us here in the UK need to act like they are.

I might even understand if they were struggling like some industries are - but if Nvidia are "struggling" then probably 90% of businesses in the world are in deep trouble.

Cash oil didn't go negative. Can look at the history of Brent Crude to see that. But yes low prices impacted oil companies at the time as breakeven was something like $30 per barrel. Brent Crude went to a low as $16 but didnt stay there long.
Oil went negative on the futures markets because demand had just evaporated very quickly and traders & others were then stuck holding the futures contracts. As they were future contracts, when the contract expires delivery has to be taken of the underlying asset or commodity in this case. So,prices went negative as it meant those holding the contracts had to pay someone to take these contracts off their hands otherwise they'd have had to take delivery of the oil. Speculators especially wouldn't want 5000 barrels of oil being delivered to their home.

Agrreed,customers shouldn't give a damn about their costs, just whether you want the product, can justify it etc, or not.

NVidia are in such a position to be able to control the market. Tesla was the same a while ago. We'd all do the same as Nvidia if we ran such a business too. They know their market well

We can only speculate on why NV seems to have steered customers towards the 4090 this gen as the others are naf for the price :D

Considering that that extraction costs can vary,they were selling oil below the cost price,plus Big Oil also has other costs too the factor in.
There are also so many instances when Big Oil have made bad bets on new oil/gas fields and lost money too. Even those traders and their associated companies - were people defending their years of profiteering just because they made a big loss? Nope.

The same goes with Big Pharma - many drugs never passed the final hurdles so all that R and D money was a loss. This is why they bet most of their longterm profits on a few drugs.

But are we seeing anyone defend these industries. Nope. Plenty of British companies go bankrupt as people would rather use foreign alternatives even in the UK. Do people start going on "pay more for British so we can protect British jobs?" Nope,even if would help protect our own industries and jobs.

So if we in the UK,and indeed most countries in the world,don't even care that much about protecting local companies,then why should we care about foreign ones like Nvidia,AMD,etc?
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
21 Jul 2005
Posts
20,243
Location
Officially least sunny location -Ronskistats
Well if you don't care about there costs,going on "but! but! their costs are higher! So it justifies their price increases".As a buyer this is irrelevant to my purchasing decisions. What I see is they can make higher Gross Margins than many companies such as Apple,Big Oil,Big Pharma who constantly get called out for this and those companies also invest billions too. Nobody cares. You can see that in the realworld.

Yep plenty of other industries this applies to, the people have the information, its just they don't want to digest it (or don't care).
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Nov 2009
Posts
24,982
Location
Planet Earth
Yep plenty of other industries this applies to, the people have the information, its just they don't want to digest it (or don't care).

There are a lot of local UK businesses who have much lower margins,and were much worse affected by the last few years than Big Tech,who have had tons of government help globally. Yet these businesses have cut their own margins and tried to meet halfway with their consumers. Yet nobody is defending them increasing prices(even if they deserve much more sympathy). Big Tech,instead, are trying their best to jack up margins during a period of global economic problems and companies like Nvidia are massively increasing pricing.

They,like many Big Tech companies,got greedy(as did their investors) on the Pandemic,which was an exceptional event. Now,they implied that "Pandemic time" massive profiteering would last for years which again shows how companies and the stock market are in a fantasy land. See how many are mass firing employees now,to maintain those "Pandemic time" financials instead of entering reality.

The same fantasy land which lead to all the stuff which lead to the Subprime. Overspeculation,excessive borrowing,etc. This is not helped by the fact governments have printed way too much money,and most of that ended up with these companies borrowing too much due to cheap credit flooding the system. It lead to people borrowing too much for things like housing,and consumer purchases. It seems in the west a significant amount of consumer purchasing has been aided by borrowing on Credit Cards and easy payment schemes:

This has enabled companies to jack up prices beyond what a lot of people would normally have afforded if they had to have the money in hand.Big Tech has dined too much on the altar of cheap credit.
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Posts
7,107
Big Tech has dined too much on the Altar of cheap credit.
Been saying this for years, a lot of the boom in the West's economies was nothing but debt. Increased property prices was just people bidding one another up with cheap credit. Rising standard of living was just people buying stuff with loans and credit cards, eventually it's got to be paid back. It's not just the lower earners either, lots of six figures households are mired in debt. One big bubble waiting to pop and along came CV19 and put a spanner in the works. Something will eventually have to give.
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Nov 2009
Posts
24,982
Location
Planet Earth
Been saying this for years, a lot of the boom in the West's economies was nothing but debt. Increased property prices was just people bidding one another up with cheap credit. Rising standard of living was just people buying stuff with loans and credit cards, eventually it's got to be paid back. It's not just the lower earners either, lots of six figures households are mired in debt. One big bubble waiting to pop and along came CV19 and put a spanner in the works. Something will eventually have to give.

The guy over on Tech YES City talks about this too. In the UK,since the Subprime crash(2007~2009) pay has barely increased with inflation,whereas pay in the previous two decades had gone up at a higher rate.

In the US it is terrible:

Do you have enough money saved to weather an unexpected job loss? If you are an adult in the U.S., your answer is likely no.


More than two-thirds of Americans — 68 percent — say they’re worried they wouldn’t be able to cover their living expenses for just one month if they lost their primary source of income tomorrow, according to a recent Bankrate survey.


The finding comes when the job market is still punching above its weight. Employers added 311,000 jobs to the U.S. economy in February, and the unemployment rate ticked up slightly to 3.6 percent from 3.4 percent — still an exceptionally low level. Inflation has been slowly coming down in recent months, too.

It's most likely we will start to see some Quantitative Tightening too. This is why all these companies are flocking to AI,as they see it as one of the areas they hope to see governments throw money at. Problem is everyone is doing it.

Greedy companies like Nvidia had a good thing with gamers,who were willing to put up with above price increases,or useless performance jumps each generation. Almost a captive market. Now they seem to want to abandon all the "loyal" PCMR. No wonder AMD is making almost as much revenue from consoles as Nvidia does with PC dGPUs. Yes,we can all argue it's lower margin,but the console market is technically still smaller than the total number of PC users.

If Nvidia,etc bothered to price things better they might even make more money(even if it was lower margin). But apparently the speculation over margins is more important.Even AMD is affected hence "we are not a budget brand" statement. This is why now we are all shocked "lower margin" Chinese companies are everywhere and still making decent enough profits.

I expect @KompuKare might have something to add to this!
 
Last edited:
Caporegime
Joined
20 May 2007
Posts
39,928
Location
Surrey
Been saying this for years, a lot of the boom in the West's economies was nothing but debt. Increased property prices was just people bidding one another up with cheap credit. Rising standard of living was just people buying stuff with loans and credit cards, eventually it's got to be paid back. It's not just the lower earners either, lots of six figures households are mired in debt. One big bubble waiting to pop and along came CV19 and put a spanner in the works. Something will eventually have to give.

I think it is all going to come crashing down massively soon.
 
Associate
Joined
3 May 2021
Posts
1,237
Location
Italy
Soldato
Joined
25 Nov 2005
Posts
12,491
The guy over on Tech YES City talks about this too. In the UK,since the Subprime crash(2007~2009) pay has barely increased with inflation,whereas pay in the previous two decades had gone up at a higher rate.

In the US it is terrible:
I don't understand this, the US all got covid bailouts which most people ended up putting into the stock market, stocks have continued to rise so they can't have been taking out any of that money so where has it gone if nobody has any emergency funds (I would class stock assets as emergency funds as it's quite easy to cash out when needed) or is stock liquidity not counted ?
 
Soldato
Joined
9 Nov 2009
Posts
24,982
Location
Planet Earth
I don't understand this, the US all got covid bailouts which most people ended up putting into the stock market, stocks have continued to rise so they can't have been taking out any of that money so where has it gone if nobody has any emergency funds (I would class stock assets as emergency funds as it's quite easy to cash out when needed) or is stock liquidity not counted ?
Because the money going to the average person probably wasn't being spent on stocks and shares,maybe just the richer people who did that.

The rest probably paid off debts,or the money meant they could actually live properly for a brief period. Some might have bought something like a new phone,new consoles,or some new furnishings or something like that.

In recent months some of these extra benefits have been cut back and its lead to problems again:
 
Last edited:
Associate
Joined
18 Oct 2002
Posts
1,333
Location
Eltham
I don't understand this, the US all got covid bailouts which most people ended up putting into the stock market
Most people? I don't think that's really representative of most people who are just going from paycheck to paycheck at all and as much as I dislike Nvidia it is also worth remembering they're not even remotely essential, no one's going to die just because they decide to gouge the market.
 
Soldato
Joined
6 Aug 2009
Posts
7,107
Because the money going to the average person probably wasn't being spent on stocks and shares,maybe just the richer people who did that.

The rest probably paid off debts,or the money meant they could actually live properly for a brief period. Some might have bought something like a new phone,new consoles,or some new furnishings or something like that.

In recent months some of these extra benefits have been cut back and its lead to problems again:
It seems a large number were buying GPU's :cry:
 
Back
Top Bottom