Nvidia have never `caved in` ever
Then quite simply, they're not going to make money this generation
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Nvidia have never `caved in` ever
I found it bizarre they halted production to keep the prices high. It means they not going to sell at that price and also have no stock when they finally cave in and reduce prices. Which means they'll can't sell cards they don't have. They're just shooting themselves in the foot down the road. It hit them hard at the end of the year.
What the hell has happened in the GPU space for this mess to be the situation.
They have to be fair and these things don't just happen over night. I think RDNA3 is AMD's gen 1 Ryzen moment. Give them a gen or 2 to improve one their chiplet design and I believe they will be competing again. (Hopefully )I'm just surprised that AMD have such success in the CPU space but can't apply the same level of engineering prowess in the GPU space. They seriously need to look into upping their game in RT core and AI core space. Until AMD cards can keep up or exceed Nvidia in RT they not a player.
I'm not sure if you are aware, but in many (most these days) cases software can read serial number of the device, which you can't change usually as the user. That's ram, CPU, GPU motherboard, SSD etc. So at least all major components are covered. And SN are supposed to be unique. Often simple windows CMD or powershell command gives you that ability.I think you maybe getting confused with how HWID bans work and how hardware is identified, like myself and others have been saying there's nothing (to my knowledge) that identifies one make & model of motherboard, HDD/SSD, display or any other component (excluding NIC MAC addresses) from another. All 970 EVO pro SSDs using the same FW are indistinguishable (from a software perspective) from one another and the same goes for all hardware of the same make, model, FW.
What you can do though, and it's what Microsoft do WRT Windows activation, is make a list of the hardware that's installed in the machine and use that as the seed to generate a hash.
I'm 99.99% certain that there's no way to identify one Nvidia 4070 from another using nothing but software, like i said before Linux allows far better interrogation of hardware and if you can't identify a unique ID using some of the tool for that then the likelihood is it's not there. Obviously with the caveat that it's almost impossible to prove a negative so the onus should really be on you to prove that there is a way to do what you claim.
I am. However as has been said many times now they can be changed and they're not unique.I'm not sure if you are aware, but in many (most these days) cases software can read serial number of the device, which you can't change usually as the user. That's ram, CPU, GPU motherboard, SSD etc. So at least all major components are covered. And SN are supposed to be unique. Often simple windows CMD or powershell command gives you that ability.
It's long term tactic to uphold high prices and profit margins. They had perfect storm of COVID and crypto craze to pump prices up and they will hold them up even if they lose huge amount of sale initially. Otherwise, if they drop prices now, they won't have excuse to push them back up. So now it's voting with the wallet long term as the only option to say no, till vendors capitulate.It's a throwing the dummy out the pram move. No one is buying at their prices so they just won't make any then, see how you like that consumers.
In a normal market if a company makes a bad product you just buy an alternative from a competitor, problem is there is little alternative here because AMDs products are non existent too.
It doesn't make sense. Every other area of PC building is competitive be it CPUs, RAM, cases, accessories. What the hell has happened in the GPU space for this mess to be the situation.
It's long term tactic to uphold high prices and profit margins. They had perfect storm of COVID and crypto craze to pump prices up and they will hold them up even if they lose huge amount of sale initially. Otherwise, if they drop prices now, they won't have excuse to push them back up. So now it's voting with the wallet long term as the only option to say no, till vendors capitulate.It's a throwing the dummy out the pram move. No one is buying at their prices so they just won't make any then, see how you like that consumers.
In a normal market if a company makes a bad product you just buy an alternative from a competitor, problem is there is little alternative here because AMDs products are non existent too.
It doesn't make sense. Every other area of PC building is competitive be it CPUs, RAM, cases, accessories. What the hell has happened in the GPU space for this mess to be the situation.
Not an easy task to change sn in many devices and if you combine a few, you have unique computer.I am. However as has been said many times now they can be changed and they're not unique.
I didn't say it was easy, i said it can be done and they're not unique.Not an easy task to change sn in many devices and if you combine a few, you have unique computer.
But it simply doesn't make sense. What would you rather have, 100% margin and sell 100 items or 10% margin and sell thousands.It's long term tactic to uphold high prices and profit margins. They had perfect storm of COVID and crypto craze to pump prices up and they will hold them up even if they lose huge amount of sale initially. Otherwise, if they drop prices now, they won't have excuse to push them back up. So now it's voting with the wallet long term as the only option to say no, till vendors capitulate.
But it simply doesn't make sense. What would you rather have, 100% margin and sell 100 items or 10% margin and sell thousands.
£500 GPU to make, sell 1,000 at £1500, £1000 margin on each one = profit £1 million.
£500 GPU to make, sell 10,000 at £800, only £300 margin on each one but you've made a profit of £3 million.
Any shareholder who prefers the first one is an idiot.
There is another possibility, which is that consumer chips gets the lowest priority in wafer allocation so low production numbers are a feature, not a bug.But it simply doesn't make sense. What would you rather have, 100% margin and sell 100 items or 10% margin and sell thousands.
£500 GPU to make, sell 1,000 at £1500, £1000 margin on each one = profit £1 million.
£500 GPU to make, sell 10,000 at £800, only £300 margin on each one but you've made a profit of £3 million.
Any shareholder who prefers the first one is an idiot.
No, it's simply that wafer-wise Datacenter products pay much better so they can afford to basically allocate the scraps to consumers.They're all obsessed with being luxury aspirational brands now. They don't want any of that regular joe money
Ok if not Microsoft then most other AI players, even GPT-3 was trained on Nvidia hardware IIRC.Microsoft are working with AMD on OpenAI - AMD are helping build `Athena` whilst Microsoft are working with Xilinx - all to try to combat Nvidia, who have 85% of the AI market