Some people in here are suggesting that the green car has right of way because it intends to turn right. Since when did intention trump position in a right of way situations?
Using that logic, if the yellow car was indicating right then the two cars would be once again be stuck there in perpetuity.
There's even two mods in this thread who have opposing views and my mother told me that mods are always right. So I'm going to continue driving as I was and constantly have accidents on mini roundabouts.
I can't believe there's any doubt here.
No-one's disputing that you give way to any traffic already on the roundabout (to your right).
All that's being discussed is that if a 'standoff' occurs between green and yellow, then green should go first and yellow should give-way.
The reason is simple, if they go at the same time, then there's a reasonable chance that (depending on acceleration) green will begin to turn right before yellow has fully cleared green's exit. If there is any collision between the two cars in the example shown, yellow is at fault (exceptions being green driving on the wrong side of the road, or something equally stupid). Good luck trying and argue that you had right of way as yellow, because you entered the roundabout a split second before the other car.
Yes yellow could 'boot it' across before green begins to turn right, but that is irrelevant to who should give way to who and ultimately who would be at fault should there be an accident. I can 'boot it' out of a t-junction in front of a lorry, but if I don't get up to speed, I am in the wrong. Same scenario - yellow can go and if they go with enough conviction, they'll probably clear the junction, but they should really give way.
Last edited: