The chassis is a big step forward on the VA models (2014+) even from a passenger perspective
Agreed! I've only been out in Kosta's car but it was immediately noticable how much better (at least stock for stock) it is than the GD.
The chassis is a big step forward on the VA models (2014+) even from a passenger perspective
The 2.5 litre was never intended for high revving. It was aimed at the US market where they are used to big volume engines that get best performance low down the rev range, and are changing up by 5000rpm. Subaru then rather foolishly put the same engine in the UK market, where drivers are used to revving the nuts off their engines; and not particularly surprisingly it turned out that the heavier pistons put a bigger strain on the con rods, which then broke. A bad map that leaned out the engine at high on two out of three settings certainly didn't help. The engine is not inherently bad, it just needs to be understood how it supposed to used. The STi 2 litre engine can take people boucing off the limiter, but the later 2.5 can't. So don't bounce off the limiter.
Plus Andrew said to do this so if it does look bad i got someone to blame.
Edit: Rewrote it as i couldn't even read what i had typed.
If they're aluminium don't use them!
Good choice btw!
The 2.5 litre was never intended for high revving. It was aimed at the US market where they are used to big volume engines that get best performance low down the rev range, and are changing up by 5000rpm. Subaru then rather foolishly put the same engine in the UK market, where drivers are used to revving the nuts off their engines; and not particularly surprisingly it turned out that the heavier pistons put a bigger strain on the con rods, which then broke. A bad map that leaned out the engine at high on two out of three settings certainly didn't help. The engine is not inherently bad, it just needs to be understood how it supposed to used. The STi 2 litre engine can take people boucing off the limiter, but the later 2.5 can't. So don't bounce off the limiter.
The 2.5 litre was never intended for high revving. It was aimed at the US market where they are used to big volume engines that get best performance low down the rev range, and are changing up by 5000rpm. Subaru then rather foolishly put the same engine in the UK market, where drivers are used to revving the nuts off their engines; and not particularly surprisingly it turned out that the heavier pistons put a bigger strain on the con rods, which then broke. A bad map that leaned out the engine at high on two out of three settings certainly didn't help. The engine is not inherently bad, it just needs to be understood how it supposed to used. The STi 2 litre engine can take people boucing off the limiter, but the later 2.5 can't. So don't bounce off the limiter.
Car looks good
Looks really good
Thanks guys, they have really grown on me now.
Anyone here ever ran BC BR Coilovers? Looking to get this done next i think, adding the 18" wheels and lower profile tyres has made the car look a bit higher. Have looked elsewherte at reviews and they seem a bit mixed, seems people who have them love them and people who have never had them wouldn't touch them???
Also has anyone tried Godspeed disks here? Seem a very good price compared anything else.
I had godspeed brakes on my wr1. Cant say i got to test them much thoughThanks guys, they have really grown on me now.
Anyone here ever ran BC BR Coilovers? Looking to get this done next i think, adding the 18" wheels and lower profile tyres has made the car look a bit higher. Have looked elsewherte at reviews and they seem a bit mixed, seems people who have them love them and people who have never had them wouldn't touch them???
Also has anyone tried Godspeed disks here? Seem a very good price compared anything else.
I had godspeed brakes on my wr1. Cant say i got to test them much though