• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Who is going to get a Pascal Titan X ?

That's a fair point and one am Missing!! If he capping at 60fps then I am quite wrong and that most games will run at much lower temps this goes for ALL Gpus ever made though even the MIGHTY hot 290/x
It seems I base all my posts these days expecting people to be running 120hz plus these days.

Edit
:o His Monitor 34" LG UM95 60HZ so could explain why is results differ from reviews.

I assume you're referring to me with that monitor?

Not right... I have 2 monitors, one for FPS and the other for other games... Asus ROG Swift 2560x1440 144Hz & Dell UP3216Q 3840x2160 60Hz

Since going 120Hz+ I don't think I could go back to 60Hz, Even with the increased temps that comes with it, It's just so smooth I can't believe it's not butter :D

Me too, although depends on the game... for the likes of Ashes of the Singularity and Warhammer Total War - I prefer playing those at 4k 60Hz as the extra smoothness isn't as much of a benefit as the extra pixels to my eyes.

But for BF4 / SW: Battlefront - it's hard to go back to 60Hz, even at 4k and in game mode the input lag isn't too high on this Dell... but it's still frustrating enough :)
 
they are saying to wait for years and years. Only buy the cheapest stuff you can, never run anything on ultra ( hey who needs that ?) and wait because in 3 years AMD will release Vega ( which will more than likely cost about the same as a Titan now ).

This whole idea where you buy great hardware and actually enjoy it while others are waiting doesn't seem to be comprehensible by some.

Your logic is so flawed it's unbelievable.
 
Your logic is so flawed it's unbelievable.

maybe, but it is my logic and people do have different opinions.

You have the right to disagree of course and no one is stopping you from sharing what you think here. Isn't that what a forum is about? You don't see me calling you names and judging you because of what you buy and I request the same courtesy in return.
 
maybe, but it is my logic and people do have different opinions.

You have the right to disagree of course and no one is stopping you from sharing what you think here. Isn't that what a forum is about? You don't see me calling you names and judging you because of what you buy and I request the same courtesy in return.

Um but didn't you do just that until I basically told you what you are now telling me? Ironic.

So me telling you that that your logic is flawed is someone as bad as you telling me I shouldnt have an opinion as in the above mentioned deleted posts? Mmmm
 
egI0HLA.png


Doom with no frame rate cap... varying between 100-150FPS on Vulkan.

Peak GPU temp = 76C

Range GPU temp = 73-76C

Fan speed = 60%

Ambient temp = 34C

Default fan profile. My custom profile would drop the temps a bit more... but I was curious what default would do. And that's my top card, which is bumped by 5-10C even when the second card is inactive.
 
uhm no, I present my opinions without attacking others. You however have a strong feeling of entitlement and feel you can judge others freely.

And it's okay for you to attack with the above post? Okay then.. whose entitled now?

I have never said that buying one is a bad idea (actually kind of is) more like buying one coming from a 1080 or even a 980ti is bad idea.
 
And it's okay for you to attack with the above post? Okay then.. whose entitled now?

that's not an attack, calling others stupid for what they buy and then justifying it by saying you are just being honest is plain wrong.

Now it's time to stop, if you understand my points then great, if not, there's no point debating this any further.
 
that's not an attack, calling others stupid for what they buy and then justifying it by saying you are just being honest is plain wrong.

Now it's time to stop, if you understand my points then great, if not, there's no point debating this any further.

I can see that you are not accustomed to others opinions or the intricacies of debating logically, so I will agree with you on this one.
 
I assume you're referring to me with that monitor?

Not right... I have 2 monitors, one for FPS and the other for other games... Asus ROG Swift 2560x1440 144Hz & Dell UP3216Q 3840x2160 60Hz



Me too, although depends on the game... for the likes of Ashes of the Singularity and Warhammer Total War - I prefer playing those at 4k 60Hz as the extra smoothness isn't as much of a benefit as the extra pixels to my eyes.

But for BF4 / SW: Battlefront - it's hard to go back to 60Hz, even at 4k and in game mode the input lag isn't too high on this Dell... but it's still frustrating enough :)

And you getting them reading while you FPS is capped at 144hz? With a Founder Edition 1080? Tell me something why is your GPU so special from all the reviews out there?
 
And you getting them reading while you FPS is capped at 144hz? With a Founder Edition 1080? Tell me something why is your GPU so special from all the reviews out there?

Most of the reviews had similar results to me... I only saw two who were having throttling issues.

Both cards perform similarly to each other.

I've posted an afterburner screenshot only a couple of post back with Doom uncapped result.
 
Anandtech review = throttling seen
Engadget = no throttling & 65-70C
Arstechnica = no throttling & 70C
Tweaktown = no throttling
Hexus = no throttling & 75C
Guru3D = no throttling & under 70C when gaming - although they were able to push it to 82C with a firestrike loop

The ones seeing throttling appear to only get it under Furmark and not under real usage scenarios.
 
Last edited:
And you getting them reading while you FPS is capped at 144hz? With a Founder Edition 1080? Tell me something why is your GPU so special from all the reviews out there?

I am guessing low ambient temps, because his results are certainly not normal for FE.
 
Most of the reviews had similar results to me... I only saw two who were having throttling issues.

Both cards perform similarly to each other.

I've posted an afterburner screenshot only a couple of post back with Doom uncapped result.

But you said your GPU sits around 70c @60 fan speed, yet your max temp on DOOM run was 80c
You even said most 1080 FE will run at 60 to 65c at 60% fan speed again you just proven yourself wrong.
 
But you said your GPU sits around 70c @60 fan speed, yet your max temp on DOOM run was 80c
You even said most 1080 FE will run at 60 to 65c at 60% fan speed again you just proven yourself wrong.

I think should just stop arguing about it, basically he is 100% definately wrong and that is all that needs to be said lol.
 
But you said your GPU sits around 70c @60 fan speed, yet your max temp on DOOM run was 80c
You even said most 1080 FE will run at 60 to 65c at 60% fan speed again you just proven yourself wrong.

Where do you get 80C from? I clearly stated and the screenshot shows maximum 76C and mostly 73-75... with an ambient temperature of 4C higher than yesterday :confused:

Don't let the facts get in the way of a good argument, eh?

I am guessing low ambient temps, because his results are certainly not normal for FE.

Then look at the reviews I just quoted? But no, you won't... because they disagree with your viewpoint :rolleyes:

And my results are in SLI in a low-medium airflow case with noctua fans, which are also not running at full speed... so added low CFM.



EDIT: I stated 70C with 60-65% fan speed on custom fan profile in a low airflow case... for a top card in SLI configuration... selective memory? Whereas I clearly stated the result I just shared was default fan curve with a higher ambient temperature.

Uhhhh... no.

Neither of my cards has ever reached 84C... even the top card when overclocked and running under load for hours. My case isn't even good for airflow (bequiet base 800).

My top one tends to sit at 70C and the bottom about 65C... that is with a custom fan profile, but the fan speed rarely exceeds 60% and never more than 65%.

Even at 60%, the fans on these are quieter than Titan X / 980Ti at 40%

I have seen a number of reports about a small handful getting to high temps and throttling, but that is the minority - not the majority.

Even now I've been in a game for a few hours (although relatively low GPU load) and the top card has sat at 59C, with the bottom card at 45C... fans hitting 60%

And that's in 30C ambient temps.

The cards run quieter and cooler than the last generation, noticeably.

The reports I've seen of AIB cards are doing even better for temps...



No, they simply do not.

So single card will easily stay under 70C even with default fan profile on a hot day in a low airflow case :rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Then look at the reviews I just quoted? But no, you won't... because they disagree with your viewpoint :rolleyes:

.

There is a german review which has a whole section on realistic temps in a case, not on an open testbench. I have used a FE and seen it get to 80c+ at 90-100% fan (in a case with 6 x noctua fans).

Go and loop timepsy on it and see if you card can run that at 60% fan at 60-65c rofl.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom