Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
To be fair if he has got used to 144hz and 144fps minimums it might well feel that way to him or others. But I am guessing for the majority that will not be the case. Unless one is playing fps games mainly, 60hz/fps is perfectly playable imo, obviously unless you just got used to high fps as mentioned.Come on now, 60fps is perfectly fine when using a mouse.
i didnt say you wouldnt notice, im saying that it is perfectly fine to use a mouse at 60fps for anyone no matter who you are. Even you.....
You do love a pollI've got a 4k screen too, it isn't like I have no comparison to base this on. The image quality comes nowhere near close enough to making up for the smoothness of 80fps+ for me.
This thread probably needs a poll, to be fair.
Ok so i ran some benchmarks of AC Origins last night and it was maxing out my i7 2600k OCed to 4.6 and my 1080ti.
Yea totally agree with that dudeOrigins runs like a dog though. The "double DRM" (or whatever it is) makes it run kinda poorly even on really powerful CPU's. Basically I'm getting better (more consistent) frame rates from Assisins Creed: Odyssey.
Agreed dude, ive never liked AA even at 1080p.....To be fair if he has got used to 144hz and 144fps minimums it might well feel that way to him or others. But I am guessing for the majority that will not be the case. Unless one is playing fps games mainly, 60hz/fps is perfectly playable imo, obviously unless you just got used to high fps as mentioned.
Personally I would not mind having a higher hz monitor and still play at 60fps, which imo is more than playable. Buttery smooth as far as I am concerned and at 4K it just looks so much better than 1440p
Playing Shadow of War right now with a controller and fps locked at 57fps as per recommendation on the blurbusters g-sync guide and the game runs silky smooth. No need to use any anti-aliasing which in many games looks like you smeared vaseline all over the image
TBH thats reason I'm sticking to 60hz monitors. Once You get used to 100fps+ there is no way back. Im happy with 30-60 range with maxed details AA and stuff to kill fpsTo be fair if he has got used to 144hz and 144fps minimums it might well feel that way to him or others. But I am guessing for the majority that will not be the case. Unless one is playing fps games mainly, 60hz/fps is perfectly playable imo, obviously unless you just got used to high fps as mentioned.
Personally I would not mind having a higher hz monitor and still play at 60fps, which imo is more than playable. Buttery smooth as far as I am concerned and at 4K it just looks so much better than 1440p
Playing Shadow of War right now with a controller and fps locked at 57fps as per recommendation on the blurbusters g-sync guide and the game runs silky smooth. No need to use any anti-aliasing which in many games looks like you smeared vaseline all over the image
Yep. Much rather spend the grunt on better image qualityTBH thats reason I'm sticking to 60hz monitors. Once You get used to 100fps+ there is no way back. Im happy with 30-60 range with maxed details AA and stuff to kill fps
This is untrue. If you were an experienced gamer on the PC scene then you would understand that its all about a balancing act, you simply cant have it all with all the money in the world so you have to make allowances here and there. I for one am much happier to have a better looking imagine at a higher resolution than continue to game at a lower resolution to gather in over 120fps at all times. Drop the console comment because you are just as close to that experience with your lower resolution!
And I am equally confused by your statement bubby, when did I mention anything about 30fps?I'm so confused by this statement, unless you're trying to run a game at 4k, 60fps is still the 'desired' fps at a minimum. 50fps may be acceptable and any lower is just a stutter/lag fest. At that point, you may as well indeed stick to console.
I game at 1440p/144hz. Whilst AAA titles and even some GPU intensive indie titles push my rig (8700k, 1080ti) to drop to the 100's and hell, even lower some times. It's still a vast improvement over 30fps...
In regards to the remark of PC gaming, been a PC gamer since I was a kid (a good couple of decades and then some). And yet I stand by my statement, the majority of people will drop settings such as HBAO/AA/texture resolution to get above 60fps. I don't know any PC gamers personally that would slap everything to max with less than ideal hardware, sit at 30fps and be happy with it. Granted, to have a top end system you need to drop a couple of grand these days. But it's a hobby... People wishing to buy mid tier hardware and expecting triple digit FPS at higher resolutions than 1080p are the inexperienced ones. You build around your resolution/desired frame rate. Not the other way round.
Again, your point confuses me as gaming on a PC at 30fps is utterly pointless.
I’m not chasing 4K. Very happy with my 1440p ultrawide. Not going 4K anytime soon.
Yeah I’m not neededing 4K
I’m enjoying gaming again this winter with a 1080ti and Ultrawide....My next game is Wolfenstein II looking forward to it...
Like playing Doom but killing nazis instead of monsters lol
4K is probably one of the greatest technologies ever discovered by humans. Just watch 4K content on a 50-inch screen - brilliant photo-realism with all the details present.
No loss of quality, it is as if you stand directly in front of the scene and your own eyes are the camera.
Penicillin is not a technology @easyrider . Plus some people can die from taking it so its not as great as you might thinkNot penicillin then?
Penicillin is not a technology @easyrider . Plus some people can die from taking it so its not as great as you might think
After the war, chemist John Sheehan from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology pioneered synthetic penicillin in 1957 and first used the term antibiotic. His work opened the door for the creation of different, bacteria-specific penicillin drugs. Research still continues today in the penicillin and related beta-lactam antibiotics.
4K is probably one of the greatest technologies ever discovered by humans.