Most people would not have a clue and if you read the release notes of both NV and AND drivers they dont give deep explanations most of the time, they just say they have fixed this problem and what situations they accrued in.
So you know what it is so why would you need an-explanation ?
Neither of your points make a great deal of sense.
Firstly, although people with a problem are always more vocal than those without a problem (therefore making the true numbers difficult to gauge), I think it is fair to say this has been a widespread issue. widespread = quite a lot of people under quite of conditions. We know the issue persists across board partners, retailers, card type, system spec, message board community, etc etc
This is the launch of AMD's flagship product. Many of us are going back to AMD after years of using NVIDIA. If you take these things into account, AMD's customer service in response to these problems has been poor. A simple message that they were looking into the problem would have sufficed.
In my opinion the scope of this issue elevates it above the majority of normal problems and their fixes. i.e.. I don't need to know, or want to know, the engineering details behind a 12% increase in the performance of Prison Architect. However, I do want to know why the GPU I purchased cannot run for longer than an hour @ stock without hard locking my machine
Also, I personally want an explanation - this has wasted my time and caused me additional expense, and if provided with further information I will be able to make my own judgement call on whether to remain an AMD customer.
Just because I buy something to play computer games with, does this somehow trivialise or remove my rights as a consumer?
I also want an explanation because i am genuinely curious as to what the technical details of the problem is. A lot of people in the community wasted a lot of their time trying to identify the cause, helping others, increasing awareness of the issue, all the time AMD were silent, so it would be nice to have this curiosity satisfied somehow.
I don't really understand why you are arguing these points, seems pretty futile.