Interesting analogy with the real world. The military leaders of the western world post ww2 aren't held in the same contempt or revulsion as their German equivalents.
Despite dropping nukes and firebombing German cities to ashes, the latter after the war was effectively over.
Ozzy man review, similar to last week, had me nodding along as felt largely the same. Rather bemused by the backlash.
That episode, taken in isolation, would in other seasons be absolutely lauded. What's changed? Maybe because the series is ending?
I really think it's peoples thoughts about how it should end not meeting expectations that's triggering some of this. Especially after how the NK was dealt with. Every. single. thing. is getting picked apart. "The dragon seeking ballista don't work anymore!" "AHMAHGAWWWD, how's that horse alive trolololol, this is last jedi bad."
The term 'lazy' is coming up a lot which I don't think is strictly fair. I commend D&D as well as the other writers and showrunners for their efforts. It can't be easy, any of it. I will however say that they've not done themselves any favours with regards to these comments. It is VERY clear that they just want it done and dusted now, plausibility and character development be damned. The quality of the writing and direction hasn't necessarily gotten any worse, it's just gotten a great deal more hastened and you can feel that in each episode.
One bog issue I have is that Dany clearly could have taken Kings landing all by herself with one dragon, the moment she arrived in westeros.
One bog issue I have is that Dany clearly could have taken Kings landing all by herself with one dragon, the moment she arrived in westeros.
This. It helps if we imagine missing scenes which might have turned credulity into credibility, but... but we got what we got; a season built around two incredibly ambitious fantasy action movies. On a scale of one to Pulp Fiction, it's right up there with Bruce Willis taking out a helicopter with a car, and makes perfect sense. All that was missing this week was The Mountain's helmet coming off to reveal Arnold Schwarzenegger.
Now that would have subverted a few expectations. I might even have forgiven D&D if they'd broken the 4th wall and fessed up like that.
Reading some of the comments in this thread makes me swear I will never take my good judgement and common sense for granted ever again. To even for a second think that the quality of the writing has not decreased is so monumentally stupid that it almost defies belief, if I did not understand that you were completely serious when you wrote that. You seem to lack a sense of judgement and perception that allows you to see the myriad of things that prove the writing has got significantly and materially worse.
I feel genuinely sorry for anyone that cannot see and understand that the writing of this show is now truly appalling, because life cannot be easy if your judgement is so bad.
- The actors all hate the season and it shows in what they are doing with their stilted and emotionless interactions
- The story arcs have been ignored and thrown away
- The plot points are no longer even pretend to be logical, in fact they insult all of our (except the unfortunate minority such as yourself) intelligence
- The scripts are out of character and awkward
- 99% of critics think it is a disgrace
- 99% of fans think it is a disgrace
I would suggest that most people complaining (like myself) are not complaining about "What" happened (Dani goes mad for example) but instead "Why or How" it happened i.e "Why did she go mad so quickly? How was her descent into madness shown - too rushed, too long etc?".
Thats one thing the earlier seasons got very right, the "whats" were never a problem because the "Why/How" was written so well, so it made sense. Yet since S7 that "Why/How" seems to be "we need it as a plot point so do it" and that lack of consistent behaviour, gained from 10 years and 8 seasons of watching these people interact, really stands out to folks hence the complaints.
Take Breaking Bad as the "anti-Complaint" example - the writing was consistent from S1 Ep1 until the end, and when they wanted to finish the writers didn't start making the characters do things "at odds" to the way they were written previously just to get the plot advanced to the finale. "What" the characters did felt "natural" because the "why/how" was still well written.
Aha, that rabid straight out of the gate huh?
It is pointless debating with someone who is already so vehemently on the attack from the off.
Zero rabidity, just a bit of emotional investment in a show and I stand by every word. If you cannot see that the writing has deteriorated dramatically in the face of overwhelming evidence then there is something deeply lacking in your judgement and perception. I know it sounds harsh, possibly even arrogant, but it is also completely fair and honest.Aha, that rabid straight out of the gate huh?
It is pointless debating with someone who is already so vehemently on the attack from the off.