You can't polish a turd!If you put a cherry on top of a turd, it's still a turd.
Wait you can.
As I said, dialing it down for Jason.
But yes, I am aware of the Tanakh and its relation to the new Testament.
Woolwich serious incident
- Thread starter Maccapacca
- Start date
Wait you can.
As I said, dialing it down for Jason.
But yes, I am aware of the Tanakh and its relation to the new Testament.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 17 Feb 2003
- Posts
- 29,640
- Location
- Chelmsford
I may have said "you're" but I was asking everyone.
LOL!
If you could be bothered to read without the red mist of xenophobia then you would know.
Because he was off duty and in a non-serving capacity, not threatening the people who killed him. Therefore, he was a non-combatant at the time they killed him
But you are a Muslim and therefore aligned to those two. Therefore, if you are allowed to attribute illegal killings by a few soldiers in Afghanistan onto someone who it is statistically likely did not do such an action then I would be equally able to do the same to you. So can I come around and give you a slap or would that be stupid? Or do you only follow through the logic when it suits your purpose which is why people like you are part of the proble,m.
You are comparing a person who is in a non-combatant role minding their business to someone who is in an active combatant role performing illegal actions against their rules of engagement.
Yes you are justifying it and can't see the difference which is why I say you and people like you are part of the problem. You seemingly can't tell the difference which either makes you a) not that clever or the more likely b) an apologist for barbarity.
You are guessing. I would suspect you would know it's hardly a secret. As someone who grew up in those foreign lands - well bordering them - I think people like you should have a serious think about what they hell you are going on about, get educated about the issues and stop justifying barbarity. For the record I did challenge the decisions, I did challenge illegal actions both by our troops and the US troops and I pressured for policy change to prevent future occurrences. Maybe you should look at my sig it may give you a clue when you are accusing me .. but I guess you can't read it ...
So what exactly have you done to change the situation bar justify the actions of murderers?
Soldato
- Joined
- 26 Dec 2009
- Posts
- 9,691
- Location
- North
I believe every country has the right to be free of occupation, i wish the UK to be safe from any attacks. I support the rights of everyone, not just some.
You've got interracial law, the mozlamic infidel... they're tryna get their law ova' our country..
Them muzlamic rayguns...
Where's your proof?
Any sane Muslim would not want to live in a country under religious rule, hell, no sane religious person would want to.
State and law should always be secular to allow people freedom of beliefs.
Additionally, I know my fair share of Muslims, and not one of them has any interest in the UK adopting Sharia law or becoming an Islamic country.
We already do live under religious rule!
Soldato
- Joined
- 13 Aug 2010
- Posts
- 3,114
Based on what, your made up truth?
Really? I must have been mistaken. I thought all religions followed the supreme leader. (me)
No, we don't. BRUV.
Take any devote Muslims, and press him on this issue and he would agree, he'll deny it at first but he'll admit it in the end. (A lot of them don't even need that much pressing!)
This is scary indeed and needs to be stamped out
Please don't stick your head in the sand, I've been heavy involved in the Muslims community at one time (was Married to one) and i have extensive experiance on Muslims attitudes
Last edited:
We do?
By 'devout' (or devote as you put it) do you mean extremist?
I know of devout Muslims that do not smoke, do not drink, follow their scriptures, pray when the time demands... they would defend the country before changing it to an Islamic state.