Caporegime
- Joined
- 1 Mar 2008
- Posts
- 26,303
Unfortunately I haven't played it for about 10 years, and I think Heskey was probably ok in the game back then.
IN real life, you just need to actually have seen Heskey play, to realise he's completely and utterly crap.
Have you EVER heard of another country playing one of their worst players because somehow one of the WORST players around makes one of the best play better?
Is it not more likely that, Rooney simply didn't have trouble playing against the Latvia's, San Marino's and other tosh we get in qualifying groups, and not actually Heskey that somehow made Rooney look good.
When you can't say "player X is good at x, y and z" he shouldn't be in the team. Heskey is NOT good at holding up the ball, he wins very few headers, he doesn't control where he knocks on the few headers he gets go like other quality target men, he can't pass, he's slow as hell, he's stupid, he can't cross yet repeated ran off to the wing to make himself open, then promptly did nothing except embarasse himself.
Thing is, EVERYONE knows he's crap, Capello knows he's crap, but he thinks Rooney plays better with Heskey than without, based on a few random games against crap teams where Rooney could have scored 2-3 no matter who was on the pitch behind him.
It was a mistake, everyone knows it and guess what, its proved to be a massive massive mistake, as has selecting King, something else everyone KNEW< didn't guess, KNEW. You don't take, and start a CB who has like a 0.085% chance of playing every game start to finish, even if he'd not gotten injured by some miracle it would still have been the wrong decision. Its the world cup, you have one squad, you don't take monumental risks and then make that massive risk the one you count on and practice with as the starting CB.
You'd think for 3-4 weeks Terry/King will have been training together, rather than Terry/Caragher, or Terry/Upson, Terry/Dawson. If king wasn't taken, as he shouldn't have been, our CB partnership, no matter who it was, would simply be better and more practiced.
That said, it's not the defence that have been the problem. It's the forwards.
This "Rooney plays better with Heskey" nonsense has to stop. So what, England need to play 2 people to get the best out of one? If that's the case, drop the pair of them. Bent, Zamora, Cole, Agbonlahor.... any of those should have been on the plane rather than Heskey. Sure, he holds the ball up, but he's a striker, allegedly. His job is to score goals.
It's also the midfield. Too many times, Lampard and Gerrard shot from around the box when they could have passed it into feet for the strikers.