WWE's Chris Beniot & family found dead.

iCraig · 27 Jun 2007 at 12:23

It's pointless passing judgement until after the toxicality results return.

I also don't know why previous 'RIP' statements are making people sick to their stomach? You do realise that those statements, along with WWE's tribute were given out before the facts arisen.

PsiFox · 27 Jun 2007 at 12:26

There is still the possibility that someone known to the Benoit family could be sitting at home watching the news oldfold feeling smug because they have got away with the perfect crime. Just because there is no signs of forced entry doesnt mean no-one else could obtain entry legally into the property. The American Authorities are reknowned for jumping on the first suggestion to enter their heads to get something on the news.

Oh God, conspiracy theory already. :confused:

Tom|Nbk · 27 Jun 2007 at 12:27

iCraig said:
I also don't know why previous 'RIP' statements are making people sick to their stomach? You do realise that those statements, along with WWE's tribute were given out before the facts arisen.

Exactly what I said.

dante6491 · 27 Jun 2007 at 12:28

Twinblade said:
Earlier posts have mention Benoit receiving a text message from his wife saying his son was ill, and to come home as it was an emergency. How do we know that someone hadn't obtained entry, killed his wife, held his son captive text Benoit from Nancy's phone and waited for him to return. Then killed his son and hung Benoit to make it look like double murder-suicide.

Or just murdered the wife and daughter, Benoit came home found the bodies, then hung himself. Then again to hang yourself from a weights machine seems very well thought out and i would think somewhat difficult. Would it not just have been "easier" to overdose on sleeping tablets?

iCraig · 27 Jun 2007 at 12:29

Ignore the conspiracies. I've already read one post from a bloke an another forum claim that it was Benoit's wrestling rival that did it. The evidence? Benoit was scheduled to win a title during one of his weekend matches, but because he couldn't turn up, another wrestler took the title in his place. :rolleyes:

Absoloute idiocy.

Twinblade · 27 Jun 2007 at 12:32

iCraig said:
It's pointless passing judgement until after the toxicality results return.

Exactly the point a small minority have been trying to get across.

I also don't know why previous 'RIP' statements are making people sick to their stomach? You do realise that those statements, along with WWE's tribute were given out before the facts arisen.

As I said in one of my earlier posts. Some people don't engage their brains before speaking.

Mr Nice · 27 Jun 2007 at 12:40

iCraig said:
Ignore the conspiracies. I've already read one post from a bloke an another forum claim that it was Benoit's wrestling rival that did it. The evidence? Benoit was scheduled to win a title during one of his weekend matches, but because he couldn't turn up, another wrestler took the title in his place. Absoloute idiocy.

CM Punk a murderer? That's not very Straight Edge....

Twinblade · 27 Jun 2007 at 12:44

iCraig said:
Ignore the conspiracies. I've already read one post from a bloke an another forum claim that it was Benoit's wrestling rival that did it. The evidence? Benoit was scheduled to win a title during one of his weekend matches, but because he couldn't turn up, another wrestler took the title in his place. Absoloute idiocy.

Im so glad your not a police officer, and if you are, I hope I never have to rely on your investigation skills.

Just because comments have been made that he did it doesnt mean its gospel and there could still be a 4th party involved. Tunnel vision is what allows people to get away with things because people are too lazy, or lack the ability to investigate things properly because it takes up too much of their precious time.

javv5 · 27 Jun 2007 at 12:45

Mick McManus for the win.

Twinblade · 27 Jun 2007 at 12:46

Nr Nice, CM Punk wouldnt of been the one being referred to as it was Jonny Nitro who filled in for Benoit at Vengence and won the title. He therefore gained the most from this incident.

On topic to that it would appear that had events not unfolded as they did Benoit would have won the match. As would have been strange to change the script any more than necessary.

Participant · 27 Jun 2007 at 12:49

Jonny69 said:
I feel I need to defend Chris Benoit....So kindly, if you have a spiteful comment, keep it to yourself.

No. This guy killed his whole family, why the hell should we keep spiteful comments to ourselves? Trust me when I say that you defending a psychotic child-killer offends me far more than spiteful comments about said individual offend you, so kindly keep your defence of this in-defencible act to yourself :rolleyes:

.

P.S. had to swallow hard with tea in my mouth when I read the Hulk Hogan comment, pmsl.

Twinblade · 27 Jun 2007 at 12:53

Robbie G said:
No. This guy killed his whole family, why the hell should we keep spiteful comments to ourselves? Trust me when I say that you defending a psychotic child-killer offends me far more than spiteful comments about said individual offend you, so kindly keep your defence of this in-defencible act to yourself .

P.S. had to swallow hard with tea in my mouth when I read the Hulk Hogan comment, pmsl.

Again, until it has been provden people can defend him all they like. Just the same as you can slate him because in your eyes he killed his family, and there cannot possibly be anything more to it.

benktlottie · 27 Jun 2007 at 12:55

Twinblade said:
Again, until it has been provden people can defend him all they like. Just the same as you can slate him because in your eyes he killed his family, and there cannot possibly be anything more to it.

I stopped posting in he thread earlier because of all the blinkered comments that were coming out, and the narrow mindedness.

I still believe there is more to this. A SANE MAN DOES NOT DO THIS TO HIS FAMILY.

Tom|Nbk · 27 Jun 2007 at 12:55

dante6491 said:
Or just murdered the wife and daughter, Benoit came home found the bodies, then hung himself. Then again to hang yourself from a weights machine seems very well thought out and i would think somewhat difficult. Would it not just have been "easier" to overdose on sleeping tablets?

Maybe he wanted to go the way his wife and son did, who knows seems he was secretly a weirdo in his personal life

Gilly · 27 Jun 2007 at 13:00

benktlottie said:
A SANE MAN DOES NOT DO THIS TO HIS FAMILY.

What is there to say that this guy was sane?

Participant · 27 Jun 2007 at 13:02

Twinblade said:
Again, until it has been provden people can defend him all they like. Just the same as you can slate him because in your eyes he killed his family, and there cannot possibly be anything more to it.

Again? What do you mean "again"? If you both our posts carefully you will see that both myself and Jonny69 were assuming guilt in our stances, so he wasn't defending him based on his potential innocence :confused:

.

benktlottie said:
A SANE MAN DOES NOT DO THIS TO HIS FAMILY

Sigh...who said this man was sane?
[edit - beaten to it, but it voices agreement of this point]

Blinkered? Narrow-minded? That's you my friend.

benktlottie · 27 Jun 2007 at 13:05

All I'm suggesting is that maybe he had some sort of mental episode, because IMHO, a sane person does not suddenly decide to kill his wife and son!

Why is that so difficult for some people to grasp ???? Its only my point of view!!!

EDIt: People here just seem to think he was some sort of weirdo that just killed his wife and child for no reason. I'm suggesting there was a mental health issue here that could have contributed to this act

Gilly · 27 Jun 2007 at 13:07

benktlottie said:
All I'm suggesting is that maybe he had some sort of mental episode, because IMHO, a sane person does not suddenly decide to kill his wife and son!

Why is that so difficult for some people to grasp ???? Its only my point of view!!!

We've grasped it easily. No problem whatsoever.

The question was, who said he was sane?

He's just as guilty, sane or not.

benktlottie said:
EDIt: People here just seem to think he was some sort of weirdo that just killed his wife and child for no reason. I'm suggesting there was a mental health issue here that could have contributed to this act

Where do you get the idea people aren't understanding you?

Lack of agreement != lack of understanding.

Participant · 27 Jun 2007 at 13:07

benktlottie said:
All I'm suggesting is that maybe he had some sort of mental episode, because IMHO, a sane person does not suddenly decide to kill his wife and son!

Why is that so difficult for some people to grasp ???? Its only my point of view!!!

By saying you thought that there was more to this and saying "a sane man doesn't do this..." you implied that you didn't believe he was responsible and you believed he was sane, and now you are saying you think he had a mental episode? Make your mind up pmsl. Maybe it's difficult for people to grasp because your points are so incoherent and make no sense.

benktlottie · 27 Jun 2007 at 13:12

Gilly said:
We've grasped it easily. No problem whatsoever.

The question was, who said he was sane?

He's just as guilty, sane or not.

OK, seemed to have misunderstood. So we're all saying he was mental now?

I do disagree with the "Guilty, Sane or not" comment. If there is any element of mental illness, then it is diminished responsibility. Fair enough, it is suggested he committed the act, but he may not have been in complete control of his senses when he did it. The placing of bible implies ritualistic, thus suggesting he wasnt quite all there when he did this...