Not a bad start to the season, new boys to the top flight Clippers smashing last seasons 2nd place 4-1 !!
We must have been in the game of the day.
Macgyvers XI - Joshs Giants
Scoring went as follows:
1 - 0
1 - 1
1 - 2
2 - 2
3 - 2
3 - 3
3 - 4
Cracking game! They had a guy sent off late in the game, and early on in the game I picked up two semi-serious injuries
[edit]Why on earth would you pay 7 million for a 17 year old with a skill of 4???
If he doesn't improve you bought a complete turkey, if he does he'll have taken up a squad place for 3 seasons before he's worth a place :/
I note that Salford FC had no subs and got a tonking. Is the account being played?
Manager Neil3k
Status: Active
Last visit: Has not shown up yet
he could and probably will turn into a 21year old 8 tho, and if he has a lot of special qualitys could fetch 25+ mil
ok i officially hate this game! There is NO REASON why I should have lost that game! look at the bloody tactics - i had you dominated completely:
CLIPPERS ASCENSION
4-5-1 << Formation >> 3-4-3
Offensive << Playing style >> Offensive
Wing plays << Offence >> Through plays
Tighten wings << Defence >> Tighten the wings
No << Prepared >> Yes
Normal << Aggression >> Normal
No << Long balls >> No
Yes << Pressure >> Yes
Yes << Offside traps >> Yes
Yes << Cheating >> Yes
Yes << Win bonus >> Yes
Archie Bent << Playmaker >> Vernon Barley
Fabiano Felix << Tightly marked >> None
Drew Bissett << Captain >> Ryan White
I had your defence and offence countered, i was prepared and you weren't! yet this happened:
Possession: 53 - 47 (54-46)
Chances: 13 - 5 (7-3)
lol WHY god WHY!? I don't want to give anything away but I guarantee 3-4-3 will never be used again lol..........
I note that Salford FC had no subs and got a tonking. Is the account being played?
[ASSE]Hinchy;10830909 said:Yes of course it is, it was just my Spicy style of football that won.
More possession for Clippers and way more shots I guess has something to do with it? I have no idea why it says I was not prepared because trust me I was (that's another part of the game I dont understand!)I had your defence and offence countered, i was prepared and you weren't! yet this happened:
Possession: 53 - 47 (54-46)
Chances: 13 - 5 (7-3)
Yes, it was entirely down to you that he named no subs
Yes, but you shouldn't have had.More possession for Clippers and way more shots I guess has something to do with it?
LOL, it means you weren't set up in order to play best against the opposition's tactics.I have no idea why it says I was not prepared because trust me I was (that's another part of the game I dont understand!)
Yes, but you shouldn't have had.
Well what sense does that make if I then win 4-1?LOL, it means you weren't set up in order to play best against the opposition's tactics.
How so?
Well what sense does that make if I then win 4-1?
It doesn't, thats the entire point of his post!
their goalie who we knocked 4 past got into the Xpert11
and manager of the week for me