explain why Bodybuilding isn't gay

Status
Not open for further replies.
the one in competitions always look like the fat blokes down the pub. (one reason why you should annoy the fatties you never know if they're secretly strongman contestants :p)

With a few notable exceptions though. Don't worry too much, you can probably outrun them if you get on your toes sharpish. ;)
 
Ha ha top thread! even more funny that one guy has rattled soo many cages.

Funny? not really if you think about it, it's just very sad how some people hide behind a forum user name purely to bait people,disrespect them and cause offence. Extremely weak and cowardly tbh.
 
Funny? not really if you think about it, it's just very sad how some people hide behind a forum user name purely to bait people,disrespect them and cause offence. Extremely weak and cowardly tbh.

Surely that is how internet forums work - they're anonymous places in which people can discuss topics and share information. I wouldn't personally want to reveal my actual identity on a forum like this...

You're accusing the OP of hiding behind a forum username simply because he's posted a controversial opinion which has wound people up yet you yourself haven't chosen to register under your real name either.
 
I have presented a well thought out argument here with a list of facts that you can research for yourself. I solicited for reasonable counter-arguments to explain how it is NOT gay, because I am open-minded to debate. All I have received is homophobically racist insults, calls for locks and bans, and other rubbish. In 11 pages I am yet to receive ANY logical counter-arguments.

I think any neutral third party observers would agree I have "won" this thread.
 
the one in competitions always look like the fat blokes down the pub. (one reason why you should annoy the fatties you never know if they're secretly strongman contestants :p)

You're right a lot of them are carrying more body mass - but don't be fooled they are strong mofos! :)
 
I have presented a well thought out argument here with a list of facts that you can research for yourself. I solicited for reasonable counter-arguments to explain how it is NOT gay, because I am open-minded to debate. All I have received is homophobically racist insults, calls for locks and bans, and other rubbish. In 11 pages I am yet to receive ANY logical counter-arguments.

I think any neutral third party observers would agree I have "won" this thread.

I'm waiting for these well presented and well thought out arguments and cogent facts... Where are they? Please don't tell me it's in your OP!!

Won!? Dude, you've made a complete tool of yourself (again) and have showed yourself to be a raging hom, which is fine, but just come out of the ****ing closet already.
 
I have presented a well thought out argument here with a list of facts that you can research for yourself. I solicited for reasonable counter-arguments to explain how it is NOT gay, because I am open-minded to debate. All I have received is homophobically racist insults, calls for locks and bans, and other rubbish. In 11 pages I am yet to receive ANY logical counter-arguments.

I think any neutral third party observers would agree I have "won" this thread.

There is not a single post I the thread that proves bodybuilding is gay. All you can say and prove is that there are gay people that do bodybuilding or are interested in it.
 
You're linking to a picture of a man who does a bit of gym work to make his body look good, that is most definitely not an extreme gay body builder.

Mind you we need clarification from Kwerk:
You do mean the guys who have muscles on muscles on muscles and get their mates to rub baby oil all over each other and down the crack of their thongs?

what would you classify as a bit of gym work?

how long do you think it would take to get a physique like his (luke guldan)?

ill let you in on a secret, many many years not months. people have no clue how hard it is to build muscle. the guys at the big shows have been taking steroid for 10 years plus. they are not normal.

to have a decent muscular physique, like the guy in the picture would probably take the average person 5 years of going to the gym at least 3 times a week. therefore he is not someone who "does a bit of gym work" as you said so. he is dedicated and has different aims/goals to ronnie coleman.

if having a physique like luke guldan's took "a bit of gym work" then every guy you see would look like him, yet how many actually do?

people who have no clue what so ever on what it takes to have a decent physique commenting on the difference between pro bodybuilder's and bodybuilders makes me laugh. the only difference is steroids. both have the same training, nutrition, amount of hours put in, just that steroids tell the body to grow, grow, and grow some more, whereas natural guys only grow at the normal rate (which is a long process).

look at your body then look at luke guldan's if all it took was a bit of gym work, then why dont all guys who like women look like that? because trust me 95% of women would prefer to have a guy with luke guldan's body than yours.

now think about it, 5 years of your life dedicated to getting that body, do you have the willpower and motivation? no? i thought so.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom