Radeon FURY thread

DAnDan · 10 Jul 2015 at 12:47

Whoops, double post!

DAnDan · 10 Jul 2015 at 12:48

Lokken86 said:
400-420 and I'm sold.

It will need to be a fair bit quicker than the 980 across the board to justify that price. But I think you're probably fairly realistic about the launch pricing.

formby · 10 Jul 2015 at 12:53

Well if the FuryX is £650 in stock the Fury will be £500-£550 in stock thats £100-£150 cheaper?

ALXAndy · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:02

does this come out today? if not when?

flopper · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:04

ALXAndy said:
does this come out today? if not when?

reviews today out already and cards later 14 july to sell

Mtom · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:04

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/2015/07/10/sapphire-r9-fury-tri-x/1

http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/sapphire-amd-radeon-r9-fury-tri-x-overclocked,4216.html

fs123 · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:04

probably nothing today since it would have been out by 1.00pm.

RavenXXX2 · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:05

£450...meh

Gregster · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:06

I didn't think these were going on sale till the 28th? I am sure that date was said at E3. Maybe the reason it is coming early is the failure rate of the Fury X chip? Stock is so scarce of the Xs, these seems a possible reason.

ALXAndy · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:08

http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru.../69792-amd-r9-fury-performance-review-19.html

Wees on the 980 by a good chunk.

JediFragger · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:09

A launch so anticipated that OcUK (the UK's biggest gfx card seller) haven't even got them listed yet lol

I still say the Asus is gonna be £500 or near to it...

mururoa · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:09

I'm fairly positive no mention of July 28th was made during E3...

In related news, Fiji Nano specs are out on a well-known German price comparison site, if you know where to look.

flopper · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:09

Gregster said:
I didn't think these were going on sale till the 28th? I am sure that date was said at E3. Maybe the reason it is coming early is the failure rate of the Fury X chip? Stock is so scarce of the Xs, these seems a possible reason.

No and no, was stated 14 of July at the amd presentation.

your thinking of Nano that was said august I think

RavenXXX2 · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:10

http://www.bit-tech.net/hardware/graphics/2015/07/10/sapphire-r9-fury-tri-x/10

Check that power consumption out.

Again poor overclocking.

I think a cheaper 980 with small oc would be the better bet.

ALXAndy · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:10

JediFragger said:
A launch so anticipated that OcUK (the UK's biggest gfx card seller) haven't even got them listed yet lol

I still say the Asus is gonna be £500 or near to it...

The triple fan Sapphire is £450. Those are always the most expensive.. Give me the bone stock for £400, oh yes oh yes.

Minstadave · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:11

Pretty unexciting at that price.

Too power hungry, doesn't clock well.

Troezar · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:13

Not looking bad at all. Some competition in the 980 space now

If they get the price right!

flopper · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:13

Godlike card at perfect price performance this be a seller for sure

Twirlywoos · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:15

ALXAndy said:
http://www.hardwarecanucks.com/foru.../69792-amd-r9-fury-performance-review-19.html

Wees on the 980 by a good chunk.

I hate reviews like that, do they think by showing the Fury Overclocked beating a stock 980 that enthusiasts will be fooled?

JediFragger · 10 Jul 2015 at 13:15

flopper said:
Godlike card at perfect price performance this be a seller for sure

This guy is gonna name his firstborn AMD, if they're still in business