Agreed. Sweet too!Eye candy is nice though ..
Agreed. Sweet too!Eye candy is nice though ..
Sometimes yes, but none of these people are "being offended on the behalf of walk-on girls", they are against the objectification of women in general. The areas where this is now showing impact (F1, darts, etc) also happen to be areas where there is zero justification for those positions, eye -candy is not a legitimate reason to most people.
Because it keeps a cycle of "attractiveness uber alles" going.
Pageants, especially child pageants, are pretty grim things. Ever notice how pretty much none of them have/allow boys to enter? You have entire generations of women being brought up to believe that beauty is all that matters. Then a multi-billion dollar make-up industry, the basically exists due to people having issues with how they look or believe they should look.
I find it funny when people complain about hown arcissistic the human race is becoming, but then have no issue with objectification based on looks.
You have entire generations of women being brought up to believe that beauty is all that matters
Is a good looking women better than a plain Jane with a PhD in genetic research against disease?
Baning the walk on girls at the start of a darts match - GOOD IDEA.
Banning the grid girls in Formula One - GOOD IDEA.
This outdated practice is sexist and has absolutely Sweet FA to do with beer bellies or fast cars.
Well aware of it thanks.You’re doing a fine job of it yourself.
Why isn't it a legitimate reason? I'm looking forward to your detailed response.
It seems the hard left is all about the oppressed and the oppressor these days. You have to take a side or they automatically lump you into helping the oppressors.
If you sit in the middle rational ground like the walk out girls for the darts they cannot comprehend it. The main problem I reckon is that there are almost no worthwhile fights left in our society. (Plenty in other societies but they never seem to complain about those).
I would say a lot of the nonsense started after gay marriage was written into law. This was the point where most rational people said "Yeah that's great, everything seems fair now, well done 21st century world, now we can all just crack on".
The laws of the land are fair, they no longer discriminate against anyone that I can see. So now we see a lot of invented outrage and outrage on behalf of other people. The only real reason I can see for this is so the hard left can feel like they are keeping the good fight going. I think the worry for a lot of them is that if there is no longer a fight or an bogeyman to battle then then the mirror might turn on them.
Trump and the old right are not the people to solve this . What we need are all the rational grown up people on the left to stop pandering to all this nonsense and call it out. The liberal media I feel is partly responsible for these agendas and milking them for click bait profit. Any news organisation hyping this stuff and misreporting it needs to be boycotted. Instead of rushing to fight back from the centre ground in the comments sections on these articles the best thing to do is unfollow / unbookmark and go elsewhere.
We have equality of the laws of the land, the best thing to do if you are gay / transgender / migrant etc etc etc is to shut up about it and be successful. Success will put you into the mainstream and make the masses normalise your presence in society as an asset. The victimhood left just want to keep you dragged down at the bottom with them.
Are they integral to the performance of the event? Nope, darts get thrown and cars get raced regardless of if there are pretty women standing and walking around.
Is it obvious why we have the likes of grid/walk-on/promo girls? Yes, to cater to the apparent inability for men to think with anything other than their ****. If this wasn't the case, you wouldn't only ever see them in male-focused activities.
I'd be interested if you could provide any justification towards actually having these things. What exactly are the positives of objectifying women to get men to spend money?
I have never been offended, or cared enough to go protest or start a petition or anything, but I agree that as a society we should be moving on from these things, I would hope my hypothetical future daughter wouldn't have to deal with this sort of mentality, but sadly it will take a view generations yet for all the knuckle-draggers and their views to go extinct.
Isn’t it enough that its just pleasing on the eye? Or are these woman waking up crying everyday because of their good looks?
Next time you have a meal don’t use any condiments because you don’t need them..
So we cant have any form over function or both?Are they integral to the performance of the event? Nope, darts get thrown and cars get raced regardless of if there are pretty women standing and walking around.
Is it obvious why we have the likes of grid/walk-on/promo girls? Yes, to cater to the apparent inability for men to think with anything other than their ****. If this wasn't the case, you wouldn't only ever see them in male-focused activities.
I'd be interested if you could provide any justification towards actually having these things. What exactly are the positives of objectifying women to get men to spend money?
I have never been offended, or cared enough to go protest or start a petition or anything, but I agree that as a society we should be moving on from these things, I would hope my hypothetical future daughter wouldn't have to deal with this sort of mentality, but sadly it will take a view generations yet for all the knuckle-draggers and their views to go extinct.
It's called Communism. Let's call a spade a spade for once and call it out for what it is.I haven't bothered reading the whole thread, because quite frankly, its all very predictable.
All I'm going to say is, I watched the darts the other day, and while it clearly didn't affect the actual match in any way, the oche part of the match was really rather boring and sterile without the girls.
Is this the type of world we want to live in? Totally joyless and clinical just so you don't offend anyone. Very, very sad. I feel for future generations if this is the trend we are heading towards.
It's called Communism. Let's call a spade a spade for once and call it out for what it is.
Radical feminists are communists. They study Maoism, they need to be hanged for treachery.
No mention of either book burning or feminism in your linked article so does that make you a fantasist, a lunatic or a liar?. . .
Lunatic feminist book burner . . .
Then why don't stiletto-shoe, make-up or tampon manufacturers associate their product with attractive fully clothed men?
Surely women aren't repulsed by their heterosexual biology?
Never seen a Diet Coke advert? Women are generally less attracted to visual cues so it's hardly surprising that we see less advertising or promotion using the male body
Depends on the context and the product.
For example, a naked woman has no place around a shiny new motorcycle in my world, as I just take one look and think she's an uninterested sales tactic that'll only get in the way.
Of course it possible to be gratuitous and out of your customers with going down the 'sex sells' avenue.... You may have missed it but this thread wasn't about naked women draped over things but was instead about relatively conservatively dressed attractive ladies accompanying darts players in stage.. So there's your 'context'
Anyone who believes men are such slaves to their sexual urges that they'll buy anything so long as there's a sexy chick somewhere nearby, is not only reinforcing the All Men Are Rapists concept that the feminazis love, but is also truly deceitful and deluded.
You are going full on strawman/womam/person there.....
I never said people were 'slaves' to their impulses to the pount that they would buy something solely or even mainly because it was promoted or advertised using an attractive member of whatever sex they were attracted to.... But the evidence is clear people are affected by things like the attractiveness and sex of a person selling something to them...
You suggested you were immune to such an effects..... I say that the evidence shows that you are either deluded or deceitful on this point.... Again I'm not suggesting that you are some autonomous slave to your biological impulses... Just that they do have some effect on you even if you are not always totally conscious at the time of these effects
All I'm going to say is, I watched the darts the other day, and while it clearly didn't affect the actual match in any way, the oche part of the match was really rather boring and sterile without the girls.