AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***

[lltfdaniel]

Ryzen achieved a score of 2557 using 135 W, while Intel achieved a score of 2040 using 180 W.

Well they did show the score on their live stream so yeah...running cinebench.

 

[Sh4rkie]

Ryzen achieved a score of 2557 using 135 W, while Intel achieved a score of 2040 using 180 W.

it wasn't 2557, it was 2057

 

[easyrider]

Ryzen achieved a score of 2557 using 135 W, while Intel achieved a score of 2040 using 180 W.

Your sure? lol

It got 2557 did it?

 

[Minstadave]

if you have a strong hand you show it. the clocks will be low. not super high . 4.5ghz will be the stable speed watch.

I'll take 16c32t at 4.5ghz - take my money!

 

[lltfdaniel]

it wasn't 2557, it was 2057

Either way it is on well on par with a 9900k whatever chip that was will come clear in the future.

 

[Potatowithearsontheside]

Yeah power was ok but it all depends on clock speed....

No confirmation that Ryzen 2 beats intel in IPC at all.

So you think it is beating on clocks...?
Gotta be one or the other, right? Or is cognitive dissonance going to rear its head here?

 

[Romedome]

Before the dunderheads take over: consider a 9900K @ 5.14GHz scores around 2250 in CB15. Now, consider an early Zen 2 8C ES is at 2050. ES tend to clock ~1GHz lower than final chips on desktop CPUs.
AMD has already won.

 

[Stephanie Peterson]

Nonsense....You have made that up...

I am sure i heard her say that was a core to core comparison, 8 v 8 - the 9900k is 8 core +HT and the ryzen chip was 8+ht.

As she showed a single chiplet cpu with its IO die and space for a second chiplet its not a hard assumption to make that the chip demo'd and the one she showed in the.. silicon.. were one and the same thing.
So if there is room for a second 8 core chiplet on that substrate then .. well there is your 12 and 16 core AM4 zen 3000 CPUs

 

[easyrider]

Either way it is on well on par with a 9900k whatever chip that was will come clear in the future.

I wanted it to destroy the 9900k

Fact is

We have Rad 7 for £700 thats as fast as my 1080ti

and a Zen chip thats on par with a 9900k

Now either you AMD lot are all on crack but thats the facts...

No mention of what tier zen it was, no mention of clock speed

 

[azazl187]

How much is it gonna cost?

 

[subbytna]

@Adored has been vindicated. For too long he was branded a shill and a nothing. Now he's got the sources to back up his claims. Nice one Jim

 

[Sin_Chase]

it wasn't 2557, it was 2057

They both finished rendering at about the same time. I'm more inclined to think it was 2057. There was not a time difference visible which would account for a 25% uplift.

 

[Doobedoo]

It scored 2056 in the demo shown.
At least that’s what I saw and still has 6 months of tweaking/refinement also it’ll likely be released at the same price that the 1600/2600 released at, so that means intel will either never sell another 9900k or will need to reduce the price by 50%.
Im happy with what I saw and will be removing my current cpu as soon as they go on sale.

Cheer up with this level of heat on Intel you might get your next Intel cpu cheaper or just swallow your pride and come over to the dark side

 

[~>Dg<~]

lets just take cinebench scores to the gaming world where does that put these gaming chips ? honestly ? it puts them still behind 6 months down the road. cinebench great scores . gaming which 90 percent want them for is behind still !

 

[azazl187]

I wanted it to destroy the 9900k

Fact is

We have Rad 7 for £700 thats as fast as my 1080ti

and a Zen chip thats on par with a 9900k

Now either you AMD lot are all on crack but thats the facts...

No mention of what tier zen it was, no mention of clock speed

You are not wrong

 

[easyrider]

I am sure i heard her say that was a core to core comparison, 8 v 8 - the 9900k is 8 core +HT and the ryzen chip was 8+ht.

As she showed a single chiplet cpu with its IO die and space for a second chiplet its not a hard assumption to make that the chip demo'd and the one she showed in the.. silicon.. were one and the same thing.
So if there is room for a second 8 core chiplet on that substrate then .. well there is your 12 and 16 core AM4 zen 3000 CPUs

Based on what? You have just made that up...

 

[~>Dg<~]

the good thing about these chips is it will make the faster better gaming chips from intel cheaper ! which is still a win win for us all.

 

[easyrider]

You are not wrong

No, Im a realist....Its amazing what Crap the AMD lot make up to justify meh....

 

[GravyMonster]

So AMD have *nearly*, but not quite, caught up to where Intel was 6 months ago. Whoop de doo. The only thing that will make this interesting is how much they can undercut Intel by price.

By the time these CPUs come to market Intel will have most likely moved further ahead anyway.

 

[Doobedoo]

where link me to the stream were its mentioned it R5?

lol

Where was it mentioned it wasn’t? They use 8 core chiplets and the die shown had one chiplet. The 2700 already scores not much less than the 9900k in cinebench does it not, plus it was drawing much less power than the 9900k.

Everything points to it being 8 core unless you know different.