they have 6 months to respond anyway. they will know already the performance. as said i have ryzen rigs i dont hate amd i have had amd chips since 2000 lol.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***
- Thread starter Jamin280672
- Start date
they have 6 months to respond anyway. they will know already the performance. as said i have ryzen rigs i dont hate amd i have had amd chips since 2000 lol.
Permabanned
Permabanned
Markings for second chiplet are visible...
Deleted member 209350
D
Deleted member 209350
Based on the rumours and leaked core/thread counts, this is in line with the Ryzen 5 8c/16t chip. The Ryzen 7 was rumoured to be 12c/24t and the Ryzen 9 16c/32t...
So what exactly have I made up?
was it? I watched the presentation....and no mention of the model
so again you have just made this up.
it was an 8 core 16 thread part.
2557 SB for Ryzen Zen 2 7nm 8C/16T
2044 SB for i9 9900K 8C/16T
1964 SB for Ryzen Zen+ 12nm 8C/16T @4.4GHz
So, ~30.2% performance uplift.
Also, a 75W Ryzen Zen 2 7nm is as fast as i9 9900K
https://www.anandtech.com/show/13829/amd-ryzen-3rd-generation-zen-2-pcie-4-eight-core
2044 SB for i9 9900K 8C/16T
1964 SB for Ryzen Zen+ 12nm 8C/16T @4.4GHz
So, ~30.2% performance uplift.
Also, a 75W Ryzen Zen 2 7nm is as fast as i9 9900K
https://www.anandtech.com/show/13829/amd-ryzen-3rd-generation-zen-2-pcie-4-eight-core
Permabanned
it still beats intel now its slower than a i9 9900k and its not even out for 6 months lol
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2019
- Posts
- 885
Yes that second chiplet shot... its obvious, thats the 8 core part and salvaged parts will create the 6 core versions, the 12 core will be a full 8 plus salvaged 6 and the top dwag will be two full 8s
Its so obvious... Intel need a ten core out for "decent" money really really fast.. because they are going to be crucified in the lower/mid range end very very soon.
Its so obvious... Intel need a ten core out for "decent" money really really fast.. because they are going to be crucified in the lower/mid range end very very soon.
Associate
Well whatever it is, intel is now in trouble maybe prehaps.
Permabanned
Still beats it and it was only a midrange cpu lol.
Associate
- Joined
- 9 Jan 2019
- Posts
- 885
I see a ryzen 8 core chiplet, with a space for another 8 core chiplet.
It was a mid range ryzen 5 8 core 16 thread cpu they demo'd - the one Lisa had in her hand.... well obviously not "the" one ... for obvious reasons..
Associate
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2019
- Posts
- 617
A stock that uses 180w is a 9900k running at 4.7GHz.
If AMD are matching that without final clocks, then their IPC is definitely ahead. One caveat though; SMT is slightly more efficient than HT.
I see a ryzen 8 core chiplet, with a space for another 8 core chiplet.
It was a mid range ryzen 5 8 core 16 thread cpu they demo'd - the one Lisa had in her hand.... well obviously not "the" one ... for obvious reasons..
Nonsense....You have made that up...
how did it beat it when it scored lower ?
Ryzen achieved a score of 2557 using 135 W, while Intel achieved a score of 2040 using 180 W.
Soldato
Jesus Christ, just how hard can DG and easyrider cry about this? I've seen some desperate deflections in my time, but this is almost embarrassing.