Associate
Ryzen achieved a score of 2557 using 135 W, while Intel achieved a score of 2040 using 180 W.
Well they did show the score on their live stream so yeah...running cinebench.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Ryzen achieved a score of 2557 using 135 W, while Intel achieved a score of 2040 using 180 W.
it wasn't 2557, it was 2057Ryzen achieved a score of 2557 using 135 W, while Intel achieved a score of 2040 using 180 W.
Ryzen achieved a score of 2557 using 135 W, while Intel achieved a score of 2040 using 180 W.
if you have a strong hand you show it. the clocks will be low. not super high . 4.5ghz will be the stable speed watch.
it wasn't 2557, it was 2057
So you think it is beating on clocks...?Yeah power was ok but it all depends on clock speed....
No confirmation that Ryzen 2 beats intel in IPC at all.
Nonsense....You have made that up...
Either way it is on well on par with a 9900k whatever chip that was will come clear in the future.
it wasn't 2557, it was 2057
You are not wrongI wanted it to destroy the 9900k
Fact is
We have Rad 7 for £700 thats as fast as my 1080ti
and a Zen chip thats on par with a 9900k
Now either you AMD lot are all on crack but thats the facts...
No mention of what tier zen it was, no mention of clock speed
I am sure i heard her say that was a core to core comparison, 8 v 8 - the 9900k is 8 core +HT and the ryzen chip was 8+ht.
As she showed a single chiplet cpu with its IO die and space for a second chiplet its not a hard assumption to make that the chip demo'd and the one she showed in the.. silicon.. were one and the same thing.
So if there is room for a second 8 core chiplet on that substrate then .. well there is your 12 and 16 core AM4 zen 3000 CPUs
You are not wrong
Where was it mentioned it wasn’t? They use 8 core chiplets and the die shown had one chiplet. The 2700 already scores not much less than the 9900k in cinebench does it not, plus it was drawing much less power than the 9900k.where link me to the stream were its mentioned it R5?
lol