Permabanned
Nvidia are only validating monitors which have a VRR range of at least 2.4:1 (e.g. 60Hz-144Hz)
Where did you get this info from please?
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Nvidia are only validating monitors which have a VRR range of at least 2.4:1 (e.g. 60Hz-144Hz)
Where did you get this info from please?
https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/news/g-sync-ces-2019-announcements/
"They also validate that the monitor can operate in VRR at any game frame rate by supporting a VRR range of at least 2.4:1 (e.g. 60Hz-144Hz)"
To clarify Nvidia also said that vrr should work without verification. All be it you have to enable it in the driver yourself regardless of ultrawide or not.Thanks,
I just looked up 2.4:1 & Google got me the page linked below but I'm still not exactly sure what it means in relation to Nvidia & the monitors involved.
Also does it rule ultrawides out or is 2.4:1 still possible?
https://www.red.com/red-101/video-aspect-ratios
To clarify Nvidia also said that vrr should work without verification. All be it you have to enable it in the driver yourself regardless of ultrawide or not.
on the certified ones yes they may well, that doesn mean the uncertified ones won't work.1 out of 400 blinking ain't bad. Freesync didn't exactly have a perfect start to be fair. I would considered this to be the same, as it matures they will iron out things like flickering etcnvidia says only 12/400 passed their certification and the non validated monitor which they showed at CES was blinking consistently. I think nvidia may be enforcing the 2.4:1 ratio when you turn it on in control panel so it will be unusable.
on the certified ones yes they may well, that doesn mean the uncertified ones won't work.1 out of 400 blinking ain't bad to be fair. Freesync didn't exactly have a perfect start to be fair. I would considered this to be the same, as it matures they will ion out things like flickering etc
I personally think the reason it was blinking is because they are enforcing 2.4:1 in the driver and the monitor was forced to operate beyond the freesync range because there were some comments that that same monitor was not flickering with an AMD card. There was also another blurry non-validated monitor. It remains to be seen whether nvidia will make any effort to improve support through monitor profiles like AMD. They would like to market their "true" G-sync monitors as better and possibly wring money out of manufacturers for certification of freesync panels down the line.
Thing is even if they are and it causes an issue to begin with, we can override a freesync range on AMD, what's to stop us overiding the range on a monitor usig an Nvidia card.not to mention cameras dont do any justice to vrr in any form. You may well be right, but I doubt they would sabotage there name at the bottom end just to sell more top end, gsync is gsync after all, regardless of vrr via driver or hardware and a lot of people seem to think gsync has now stagnated hence the move. It wouldn't make sense to purposely sabotage this.I personally think the reason it was blinking is because they are enforcing 2.4:1 in the driver and the monitor was forced to operate beyond the freesync range because there were some comments that that same monitor was not flickering with an AMD card. There was also another blurry non-validated monitor. It remains to be seen whether nvidia will make any effort to improve support through monitor profiles like AMD. They would like to market their "true" G-sync monitors as better and possibly wring money out of manufacturers for certification of freesync panels down the line.
The title is quite misleading. nVidia is not supporting freesync at all.
nVidia has been using adaptive sync for years. They are not 'now' using it.
They have? Show me where they have been using it.
In laptop screens
What makes you think that? They have only said that the 2.4:1 ratio is required for validation. They are not going to try to run a monitor out of spec.nvidia says only 12/400 passed their certification and the non validated monitor which they showed at CES was blinking consistently. I think nvidia may be enforcing the 2.4:1 ratio when you turn it on in control panel so it will be unusable.
I wonder if that 400 includes monitors which don’t meet their refresh range requirements and so were simply failed by default.One thing that people need to understand here at this moment 400 monitors tested and only 12 have passed. That is quite a small number for such amount of tested.
It’s LambChop, I expect nothing less from himA bit of a pedantic post from you. Nvidia is now supporting Adaptive sync. Adaptive sync and Freesync have become synonymous with one another and people say Freesync they are mainly using it to refer to adaptive sync on the monitor not AMD's method of connecting. But, you know this.