Cancel culture expands to real life in the USA

Nice of you to miss out the teachers asking very young children who's parents are police officers about doing a essay on cop killing.
Or the teacher calling some people "Pasty"

Or calling the children names if they don't support blm ect.
And The 2 named teachers that want to back an illegal group.

You know what's that called? selective listening.

Now if that was a trump supporter you would be having a right go.
Are you trying to cancel these teachers for expressing their opinions online? Surely the school policy would override whatever they have said online in any case.
 
Are you trying to cancel these teachers for expressing their opinions online? Surely the school policy would override whatever they have said online in any case.


Online? no. That's there First Amendment right.

"cough" teachers asking very young children who's parents are police officers about doing a essay on cop killing.
Or the teacher calling some people "Pasty" "cough"

Stop thinking UK.
A US teacher did say what he thought about the cancel culture and got sacked.
Just looked it's going to court. Rule for one rule for another.

I'm glad that FL is leading the way again by banning critical race theory.
Another 1st.
 
Last edited:
Online? no. That's there First Amendment right.

"cough" teachers asking very young children who's parents are police officers about doing a essay on cop killing.
Or the teacher calling some people "Pasty" "cough"

Stop thinking UK.
A US teacher did say what he thought about the cancel culture and got sacked.
Just looked it's going to court. Rule for one rule for another.
The internet isn't covered by the first amendment.

Also it is 'their' not 'there'.

Why wouldn't students do an essay on cop killers? It is a big problem in the US. They murder a frightening amount of human beings.
 
The internet isn't covered by the first amendment.

WRONG again

""[Teachers] have a right to their political opinions, and they have a right to engage in political speech,” said David Hudson, Jr., a law professor at Belmont University in Nashville, Tenn., and a First Amendment Fellow for the nonpartisan Freedom Forum Institute. “Political speech is the core expression that the First Amendment was designed to protect.”"


Why wouldn't students do an essay on cop killers? It is a big problem in the US. They murder a frightening amount of human beings.

Already answered or watch the video.

Just stick to the UK things ;)
 
WRONG again

""[Teachers] have a right to their political opinions, and they have a right to engage in political speech,” said David Hudson, Jr., a law professor at Belmont University in Nashville, Tenn., and a First Amendment Fellow for the nonpartisan Freedom Forum Institute. “Political speech is the core expression that the First Amendment was designed to protect.”"




Already answered or watch the video.

Just stick to the UK things ;)
Try and access some of your favourite websites in a US library and you'll see how much of that first amendment applies to the internet ;)

Also, almost every website you interact with on the internet is a commercial entity that can self-govern. You also pay a commercial entity for your pipe to connect to the internet. So whilst it may be "free" by name it certainly doesn't have limitless platforms for freedom of speech as the right wing nut jobs interpret it.
 
Nice of you to miss out the teachers asking very young children who's parents are police officers about doing a essay on cop killing.
Or the teacher calling some people "Pasty"

Or calling the children names if they don't support blm ect.
And The 2 named teachers that want to back an illegal group.

You know what's that called? selective listening.

Now if that was a trump supporter you would be having a right go.

What's your definition of "very young children"

It's clearly a high school and teaches grade 9-12 students.

Grade 9 is 14-15 years old...
 
emmmm get your facts straight what she said she stands for this week, which isn't where she's stood before...so what's she going on about etc... you guys always take a sliver of the full scenario and run with it don't you?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Representing a country she hates is pretty dumb

Who says she hates it all? I've not seen her make any such statement. She is making a statement of protest, something that is specifically protected in the US Constitution. It has triggered conservatives but she has a 1st Amendment right. Also this is her job and the Olympics is a pinnacle for athletes. Why wouldn't she want to represent, the fact she isn't happy with aspects of her country is irrelevant. We are all allowed to call out our own country. You might not like her message, I might not like her message but trying to cancel her Olympics because of it is as cancel culture as it gets.
 
Who says she hates it all? I've not seen her make any such statement. She is making a statement of protest, something that is specifically protected in the US Constitution. It has triggered conservatives but she has a 1st Amendment right. Also this is her job and the Olympics is a pinnacle for athletes. Why wouldn't she want to represent, the fact she isn't happy with aspects of her country is irrelevant. We are all allowed to call out our own country. You might not like her message, I might not like her message but trying to cancel her Olympics because of it is as cancel culture as it gets.

Absolutely spot on.
 
An elected representative attempting to cancel an athlete for a silent protest protected by the 1st Amendment. Just imagine what he'd say if she'd stormed the Capitol Building in an act of insurrection!


Have you seen her tweets? If she was white and had written those tweets referring to black people instead she would have likely been "cancelled" already.
 
Who says she hates it all? I've not seen her make any such statement. She is making a statement of protest, something that is specifically protected in the US Constitution. It has triggered conservatives but she has a 1st Amendment right. Also this is her job and the Olympics is a pinnacle for athletes. Why wouldn't she want to represent, the fact she isn't happy with aspects of her country is irrelevant. We are all allowed to call out our own country. You might not like her message, I might not like her message but trying to cancel her Olympics because of it is as cancel culture as it gets.

Spoken by another person who hates their country
 
What's your definition of "very young children"

It's clearly a high school and teaches grade 9-12 students.

Grade 9 is 14-15 years old...


Just saw this.

If you know the school then out with it :)

But let me say the school lost the funding for their stupid course.
 
This page has been hilarious for watching people desperately avoid condemning ******* behaviour by the teachers because the person who pointed it out is @deuse
 
I see Nikki Hayley has joined the cancel culture crew with US athletes. Either conform to what we say patriotism is or we'll stop you competing at the Olympics.


If you are there as a representative to your country why shouldn't your county be able to specify the terms.

If that person didn't want to represent their country which would include things like supporting the flag, national anthem and a general showing of respect to your fellow citizens, then they are welcome to compete as an individual without state funded support.

As for the things she said in the past, plenty of white folk have been cancelled for far less, and for things that were said much longer ago as well.
 
Back
Top Bottom