• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

LuxMark 2.0 Bench Thread

N19h7m4r3 said:
Here's the results for my FirePro D700's in Windows 8.
In Windows 8.1 64-bit Enterprise
AMD FirePro D700 6GB x2
Drivers: Catalyst 14.4
GPU Clocks Default. Core 850Mhz Memory 1370Mhz

iYIfFXVJa1aKP.png


ir5PpB3uqkf9g.png


ip9oaybdzlfDd.png


Here's the results under 2.1 in OSX

Drivers Default OSX 10.9.2
Clocks GPU 1 850Mhz
GPU recognised as 150Mhz, should be 850Mhz ( possibly a bug in Luxmark reading the second GPU in Idle state )

iPai8jJzazWQJ.png
Click to expand...

Dual D700's, is that the new MAC-Pro?
 
shankly1985 said:
Crossfire 290's @977/1250

14.4 RC1
Room
Score - 2748
Screenshot%20%28108%29.png
Click to expand...

Two points Lamb Shanks, two points! I will make that up somehow, even with lower clocks. Muahahahah!

I changed to the beta drivers and got a few extra points.

Complex - Score 2746
290 Crossfire @975/1250
14.4 Beta

38WxaS4.jpg
 
Last edited:
Read it and weep Shanksy boi. Had to use Windows 8 diagnostic startup to get these scores. Can't beat you on Complex though, will have to settle for a draw, though i suppose i theoretically take 1st place as i have slightly lower gpu clocks. :p

14.4 Beta is definitely scoring higher than 14.4 WHQL for me.


290 Crossfire@975/1250
14.4 Beta

HDR Ball

uoHbbQk.jpg


Sala Medium

0XBjcRh.jpg


Room Complex

IPCS3eF.jpg
 
Been having a quick play with this.

I've noticed a few things...
  1. Uncle Petey that's a good score, my 7950s don't come close to that! (Although they're not clocked nearly as high)
  2. While I can't beat Humbug's Single card score, I think my 7950s probably beat him on Bang-for-Buck based on their score. I think Uncle Petey's 7970CF probably beat that though, depending on how much he paid.
  3. The application seems to detect and display the clocks you were using when you loaded the application, however the score reflects the clocks you were actually running.
 
GoogalyMoogaly said:
Been having a quick play with this.

I've noticed a few things...
  1. Uncle Petey that's a good score, my 7950s don't come close to that! (Although they're not clocked nearly as high)
  2. While I can't beat Humbug's Single card score, I think my 7950s probably beat him on Bang-for-Buck based on their score. I think Uncle Petey's 7970CF probably beat that though, depending on how much he paid.
  3. The application seems to detect and display the clocks you were using when you loaded the application, however the score reflects the clocks you were actually running.
Click to expand...

Yes it does not detect core overclocks so its important for people to list them. Scores definitely improve with overclocking though.

snips86x said:
How do you find TriXX?
Click to expand...

I only use it on my 7770 system as it allows for 1.35v where as afterburner only allows 1.3v.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom