LuxMark 2.0 Bench Thread

[humbug]

This is my 4930k @4.0 on it's own

If I run it at the same time as the 290Xs it only adds about an extra 70 points to the score the cards get on their own. I think most of it's processing power is used driving the GPUs and so there is little left over to add to the score.

Just for funnies, Phenom II x6 1090T @ 4Ghz

 

[LtMatt]

Q8200 @3ghz
4GB DDR2 @1066Mhz
HD7770 @1300/1250 @1.35v
14.4 Beta

Complex

Spoiler

Sala

Spoiler

Simple

Spoiler

 

[humbug]

Good clock on that card Matt.

 

[humbug]

Here's the results for my FirePro D700's in Windows 8.
In Windows 8.1 64-bit Enterprise
AMD FirePro D700 6GB x2
Drivers: Catalyst 14.4
GPU Clocks Default. Core 850Mhz Memory 1370Mhz

Spoiler

Here's the results under 2.1 in OSX

Drivers Default OSX 10.9.2
Clocks GPU 1 850Mhz
GPU recognised as 150Mhz, should be 850Mhz ( possibly a bug in Luxmark reading the second GPU in Idle state )

Dual D700's, is that the new MAC-Pro?

 

[LtMatt]

Crossfire 290's @977/1250

14.4 RC1
Room
Score - 2748

Spoiler

Two points Lamb Shanks, two points! I will make that up somehow, even with lower clocks. Muahahahah!

I changed to the beta drivers and got a few extra points.

Complex - Score 2746
290 Crossfire @975/1250
14.4 Beta

Spoiler

 

[humbug]

Two points Lamb Shanks, two points! I will make that up somehow, even with lower clocks. Muahahahah!

I changed to the beta drivers and got a few extra points.

Complex - Score 2746
290 Crossfire @975/1250
14.4 Beta

Spoiler

I'm still waiting for someone to knock me off the top of the single GPU Table.

 

[LtMatt]

I'm still waiting for someone to knock me off the top of the single GPU Table.

Don't tempt me.

Don't worry though, im sure Kaap will be along to take all the crowns soon. He's the only one posting water cooled 290 benchmarks so we've got no chance against him.

 

[humbug]

Don't tempt me.

Don't worry though, im sure Kaap will be along to take all the crowns soon. He's the only one posting water cooled 290 benchmarks so we've got no chance against him.

He's just being nice, giving me some time at the top before kicking me off.

 

[N19h7m4r3]

Dual D700's, is that the new MAC-Pro?

It is indeed.

 

[humbug]

Drool....

 

[Ian Evey]

got 18842 on the hdr ball thing, can not take screenshot though as it crashes when its finished. Class this as an unofficial entry

 

[LtMatt]

Read it and weep Shanksy boi. Had to use Windows 8 diagnostic startup to get these scores. Can't beat you on Complex though, will have to settle for a draw, though i suppose i theoretically take 1st place as i have slightly lower gpu clocks.

14.4 Beta is definitely scoring higher than 14.4 WHQL for me.


290 Crossfire@975/1250
14.4 Beta

HDR Ball

Spoiler

Sala Medium

Spoiler

Room Complex

Spoiler

 

[Uncle Petey]

7970CF @1250/1800
14.4 WHQL

Luxball

Spoiler

Sala Medium

Spoiler

Room Complex

Spoiler

 

[snips86x]

Here is mine, using 14.4 WHQL drivers

Spoiler

 

[LtMatt]

7970CF @1250/1800
14.4 WHQL

Luxball

Spoiler

Sala Medium

Spoiler

Room Complex

Spoiler

And on the scoreboard.

Nice Sala and Room scores.

 

[GoogalyMoogaly]

Been having a quick play with this.

I've noticed a few things...

1. Uncle Petey that's a good score, my 7950s don't come close to that! (Although they're not clocked nearly as high)
2. While I can't beat Humbug's Single card score, I think my 7950s probably beat him on Bang-for-Buck based on their score. I think Uncle Petey's 7970CF probably beat that though, depending on how much he paid.
3. The application seems to detect and display the clocks you were using when you loaded the application, however the score reflects the clocks you were actually running.

 

[snips86x]

How do you find TriXX?

 

[LtMatt]

Been having a quick play with this.

I've noticed a few things...

1. Uncle Petey that's a good score, my 7950s don't come close to that! (Although they're not clocked nearly as high)
2. While I can't beat Humbug's Single card score, I think my 7950s probably beat him on Bang-for-Buck based on their score. I think Uncle Petey's 7970CF probably beat that though, depending on how much he paid.
3. The application seems to detect and display the clocks you were using when you loaded the application, however the score reflects the clocks you were actually running.

Yes it does not detect core overclocks so its important for people to list them. Scores definitely improve with overclocking though.

How do you find TriXX?

I only use it on my 7770 system as it allows for 1.35v where as afterburner only allows 1.3v.

 

[GoogalyMoogaly]

Yes it does not detect core overclocks so its important for people to list them. Scores definitely improve with overclocking though.

Oh, didn't notice that it didn't detect overclocks at all (only noticed it at all after seeing Uncle Petey's screenshots, which do show his clocks correctly.

 

[LtMatt]

Oh, didn't notice that it didn't detect overclocks at all (only noticed it at all after seeing Uncle Petey's screenshots, which do show his clocks correctly.

I've not noticed it detecting the correct clocks on Hawaii, but i don't recall if i actually restarted the program. Test it and post your results gm.