Not always, it depends entirely on ones setup and what game they are playing, the only setup where I would recommend to set it on and forget about it would be a ryzen 5xxx and RDNA 2 setup. I find it helps on the whole but there are scenarios where performance was slightly reduced or/and encountered severe issues such as in fc 6 from my "experience" anyway.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
10GB vram enough for the 3080? Discuss..
- Thread starter Perfect_Chaos
- Start date
- Status
Not always, it depends entirely on ones setup and what game they are playing, the only setup where I would recommend to set it on and forget about it would be a ryzen 5xxx and RDNA 2 setup. I find it helps on the whole but there are scenarios where performance was slightly reduced or/and encountered severe issues such as in fc 6 from my "experience" anyway.
Bhawahahahahaha!!!
Basically the same thing he says... The gap is bloody bigger than the gap there is between a 3080 and 3090 for godsakes. What utter rubbish
Here is a screen grab:
Yep, no difference indeed. Hahahahahaha!
Erm, I paid £460 or there about's as I recall. Was essentially free from my 3080 sale where I made £1000+ profit from selling it to CEX
Too funny dude, clutching at straws or what
But weren't people holding TPU/wizard comments in high regards because he said about vram issues or something, now all of a sudden, "clearly never played the game", goalposts right there ladies and gentlemenJust like the fury x comments of "4gb being enough for 4k"
And yet you come to the conclusion "it's basically the same", not see the flaw here, also depending on res. and game, it is more than 25% at times....
Like I said, coming from a 2070s for a potential outlay of £450+? Is it worth it? Nope. Had you sold on your 2070s to bring the 3070 down to say <£200, then depending on ones needs/wants, it "might" be worth it.
And if you read through the thread, you will see it was debunked. In fact HU did 2 videos as they got called out for their results showing nvidia being better than amd, turns out the testing scene they used had more action/enemies where as other sites tested areas with nothing happening
Exactly. And the usual lot even without realising show their bias by agreeing with such tripe.
Soldato
Well it played fine on my end so *shrugs* Sorry forgot I need to force rebar on so as to gimp my setup and then encounter said issues
PS. just for a laugh, the fury x days
Good times
I had a Fury X not long ago in my HTPC and it performed well for the games I played on it, Sadly 1 of the tubes decided to leak.
Caporegime
Bhawahahahahaha!!!
Basically the same thing he says... The gap is bloody bigger than the gap there is between a 3080 and 3090 for godsakes. What utter rubbish
Here is a screen grab:
Yep, no difference indeed. Hahahahahaha!
Erm, I paid £460 or there about's as I recall. Was essentially free from my 3080 sale where I made £1000+ profit from selling it to CEX
Too funny dude, clutching at straws or what
Exactly. And the usual lot even without realising show their bias by agreeing with such tripe.
That's one example, here is another, 14%, i can get that with an overclock.
That's one example, here is another, 14%, i can get that with an overclock.
So what your saying is, there is a difference?
Oh and wtf is a 3070 Super?
Caporegime
So what your saying is, there is a difference?
I didn't say there wasn't a difference, i said its a 2070 with mustard up its bottom, its like a 2070 but a bit faster, like an overcloked 2070.
You literally said is basically the same thing….
What you are saying makes no sense.
Here is a somewhat recent review of a 3070 and at 1440p I had a look and on average it is around 33% better. But yeah, basically the same thing
Caporegime
It is, the performance difference is not enough to make any difference to what settings i can use and as for the rest of it, well its exactly the same thing.
Caporegime
I'll tell you what it is, its an Nvidia Core i7 7700K.
Last edited:
Caporegime
Oh, 33% extra performance does not make a difference to humbug guys, so that means its basically the same thing. Couldn’t make this up. Clutching at straws as I said
With all this noise maybe the RTX 4070 is going something a bit better, a bit 'More' eh?
Soldato
Yeah at least you can notice the company shenanigans which is a good thing. I had this downloaded quite a while back but now I completed Odyssey I may give it a whirl.
Soldato
Soldato
'Enough'. Did he answer with his current/previous cards yet?
Caporegime
Rumour is nvidia are using this in their Ada lineup.. thanks AMD!
What, hardware thread scheduling?
Soldato
Soldato
This I think.
Well any 'neutral' 3080 owners would be great.
The approved list endorsed by debunker Matthew? or just user forum spam obfuscation like he uses selectively?
Caporegime
Oh that, yeah, its not as simple as just increasing the size of the cache tho, not without other tweaks and optimisations, simply growing the cache makes it physically larger, which increases latency and with that you could lose whatever you gain from having more.
Its no good looking at the 5800X3D and concluding "oh, bigger cache = more performance, well that is simple enough" it isn't, AMD have spend the last few years working with and perfecting not just large cache latency but also off die latency, to the point now where you can have a chunk of cache on a completely different CPU die and it not matter one bit.
I'm sure Nvidia will figure it out, they are far more talented than lets say, Intel, but i would rather they work on their thread scheduling, that is a far more pressing problem, IMO.
Talks a load of tripe, gets arse handed to him, so what does he do? Strawman
Too funny seeing the rest of the off topic nonsense posted also
Caporegime
- Status