Yes, those are controlled by mcupdate_genuineintel.dll (Intel) / mcupdate_authenticamd.dll (AMD) if you remove those files out of the System32 folder it stops the auto updates on both platforms and then you can run a UEFI/BIOS defined MC if your MB supports those features.
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
14th Gen "Raptor Lake Refresh"
- Thread starter Dave2150
- Start date
Yes, those are controlled by mcupdate_genuineintel.dll (Intel) / mcupdate_authenticamd.dll (AMD) if you remove those files out of the System32 folder it stops the auto updates on both platforms and then you can run a UEFI/BIOS defined MC if your MB supports those features.
Finally updated my z790-h to the latest microcode. With all the intel defaults on the 14900k cracked 36k on R23, with the wattage limits increased (I have a full custom loop) and a -0.15v undervolt it hit 40k again so it all seems about the same as before. Now that this is here I'll toy with voltages to see if I can get a tiny bit higher when I have a boredom window. At some point I might go direct die.
Associate
- Joined
- 30 Mar 2017
- Posts
- 963
Hi all, I have been watching buildzoid videos recently on the raptor lake issues. In one of his latest videos on the apex encore he says that a higher voltage is observed with lower LLC level 3 1.100mohms vs LLC level 5 0.73mohms. I presumed one of the main issues was that the AC/DC load lines were set too high. So why would lower values lead to a higher max voltage? Thanks!
at 10:56:
at 10:56:
Last edited:
Associate
- Joined
- 4 Dec 2008
- Posts
- 1,983
My 14900k on Asus Apex Encore with new microcode has 37956, not bad
Running it stock on latest bios or undervolted/overclocked?Got say am still really pleased with my 14900k
Am running it on a very old Bios which was before all the power limit cuts
The only thing i changed from my motherboard default settings was the max power draw of PL1 to 200watts & PL2 to 285watts.
I can always increase them again if needed
Last edited:
Soldato
- Joined
- 29 Jul 2004
- Posts
- 7,134
Try this, your score is pretty much the same as my 13900k using the settings here (although cores are at 53 not 55)
Last edited:
Under-volting is the new overclocking...you can cap the volatage quite well and still run 100% boost 24/7, and still get very close cinebench scores, so close it's almost margin of error compared to stock @100% boost.
I think your safe, they have not been on since April 2013!lol I didn't mean to tag the user who calls themselves "100%" hehehe
Should come with a security sticker on the box to see if it's opened.
No reason not buy a brand new one, especially if you under volt. I've not updated bios but I've been running under volted since day one as it's a no brainer to keep a lid on heat and power draw for essentially zero performance cost.
That said I wouldn't go out of my way to buy one unless nessesary... Socket is pretty much end of life so. I'd go AMD if building a whole system right now.
Just having creator pc/photo pc build with a 14900k and gigabyte aero g will i get issues with this configuration ,will the new bios microcodes help ?,do i ask the pc builders to install fixes and under volt as i am not sure this is the sort of thing i am that competent in setting in bios or never had the need to before ,do i run a system check bench to see if i have issues when it arrives? with regards to heat and power consumption any info appreciated
I'd update the BIOS for sure.
To check voltages and temps, just run HWmonitor in the background and then run cinebench to load up the CPU to 100%.
Associate
- Joined
- 4 Dec 2008
- Posts
- 1,983
Will try, thanks