Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
If it works for him than what's wrong with that.?
People are heavily biased towards amd, they refuse to accept that Intel is very very efficient in mixed workloads. What can you doIf it works for him than what's wrong with that.?
I for example love using emulators and since switching to AMD cpus the experience wasn't great. Even now Intel cpus are quite a bit faster than AMD in this regard.
If it wasn't for the fact that LGA1700 is a dead platform now I would go with 13700k instead of 7800x3d and It would cost me less and give me more multithreaded performance.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-core-i9-13900k/15.html
My 5800X never goes below 30W when idle and constantly jumps up.
If it works for him than what's wrong with that.?
I for example love using emulators and since switching to AMD cpus the experience wasn't great. Even now Intel cpus are quite a bit faster than AMD in this regard.
If it wasn't for the fact that LGA1700 is a dead platform now I would go with 13700k instead of 7800x3d and It would cost me less and give me more multithreaded performance.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-core-i9-13900k/15.html
If it works for him than what's wrong with that.?
I for example love using emulators and since switching to AMD cpus the experience wasn't great. Even now Intel cpus are quite a bit faster than AMD in this regard.
If it wasn't for the fact that LGA1700 is a dead platform now I would go with 13700k instead of 7800x3d and It would cost me less and give me more multithreaded performance.
https://www.techpowerup.com/review/intel-core-i9-13900k/15.html
Oh wow that’s a massive difference compared to non 3D chips.Zen 4 x3d do well in emulation, pretty sure 7800x3d will be doing it using less power
So about the same power consumption while pushing way more frames. Clearly Intel is not as bad as people are making it out to be.
Yeah in idle / light / mixed workloads they are very efficient. Except the 13900k which is a power hog in gaming, unless you underclock it. Even in full heavy mt usage, when testing at iso wattage amd is around 10 to 15% more efficient, with the exception of vray where the difference is 19%
It appears so yes. Apparently it was possible to enable avx512 on early 12900k models by disabling e cores and that put it way ahead of Ryzen. Something like 70 fps in rpcs3
Yes, early bios and first batch 12900k like mine can do it. But ecores are giving a huge boost in recent games so I don't advice anyone to have them off.
In this example @Bencher ’s 12900k is much more efficient than my 5800X.
oh yeah for sure it does which is probably why Intel decided to disable itright in thinking avx512 increases power a lot ? would be interesting how much less 7800x3d uses
Is someone actually trying to save Intel here.? I’m looking for best cpu for my use case regardless of brand.
If you are not doing anything remotely heavy in terms of multithreaded, go Intel. Technotice has an interesting comparison with power from the wall for creators, the 13900k slaughters the 7950x in terms of both performance and efficiency. That's because photoshop premiere and the rest of Adobe suite is a mixed workload and in those Intel thrives. If you are running prime or cinebench on a loop in the other hand, go for amd, they have a 10-15% advantage.
