So if that was the case why close the comments off? By doing so they only lose hits and ad-revenue for those who havent blocked all DailyFail ads.
As for the McCanns and their funding, thats a crazy argument, most of the UK were asking why the hell they were getting special treatment and almost unlimited funding.
Most of the media were attacking the investigators saying they were off on their jollies etc when doing detectiving in Portugal.
The McCanns is the poorest argument yet. (ps she blatantly died in the apartment and they covered it up, there is liteally no other reasonable explanation)
This is how modern Britain functions.They don't want anyone going against their narrative that's why.
Better to talk about now, then actual live through it in the future.It’s obvious why the comments were disabled;
They don’t want a race war in their comments, it would be knuckle draggers saying the kid did good and all Syrians should be beat down and then the opposite view that the white kid should be battered and made to pay for his actions.
Who seriously wants that?
So if that was the case why close the comments off? By doing so they only lose hits and ad-revenue for those who havent blocked all DailyFail ads.
Better to talk about now, then actual live through it in the future.
As you say, they've got to pander to a wide church - dog-whistling to their core bigot readership, while not alienating the relatively new and massive audience of their "side bar of shame".The Daily Fail website user base is a weird one.
So if that was the case why close the comments off? By doing so they only lose hits and ad-revenue for those who havent blocked all DailyFail ads.
As for the McCanns and their funding, thats a crazy argument, most of the UK were asking why the hell they were getting special treatment and almost unlimited funding.
Most of the media were attacking the investigators saying they were off on their jollies etc when doing detectiving in Portugal.
The McCanns is the poorest argument yet. (ps she blatantly died in the apartment and they covered it up, there is liteally no other reasonable explanation)
Why are people assuming that people who donated made a conscious decision between helping a syrian kid and a white kid?
Disagree, something not right with someone if they waterboard a kid with a broken arm in school regardless
age and they will go on to do worse as an adult
. It's well beyond the usual beatings kids used to dish out to each other when I was younger.
Even if you got a proper going over you could dust yourself down and walk home
kid is having his life ruined and his families lives ruined as a consequence.
yes, I am standing by my judgement of punishment by way of being launched into the sun.
Just saw on the news that the Syrian kids sister also being bullied, again filmed on phone. I’m sure some of the commentators in here will claim these 2 incidents are not related.
You're about 300 posts behind.
Oops, trying to keep up
Your punishment is a bottle of Evian to the face.
Better to talk about now, then actual live through it in the future.
ITT: people not knowing what bullying was like in the 80s and 90s. Make you or break you I think is the appropriate description.
If you didn't respond with physical violence in my school you were utterly destroyed.