• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

;)

String said:
Seems a bit bizarre given the BIOS issues with the original Ryzen launch.
Click to expand...

They brought a load of the original too and swapped out all the old 4 core systems we had. We even used a few as rendering machines because they were long in the tooth. We can now move them and get Threadripper in place for those.

The bios issues with 99% of it was for doing any overclocking be it RAM or CPU. Since work keeps things at stock then no problem.

Also the principles of the RAM and bios for Threadripper shouldn't have the same amount of issues but our internal IT department seem happy with them tbh.
 
Curlyriff said:
They brought a load of the original too and swapped out all the old 4 core systems we had. We even used a few as rendering machines because they were long in the tooth. We can now move them and get Threadripper in place for those.

The bios issues with 99% of it was for doing any overclocking be it RAM or CPU. Since work keeps things at stock then no problem.

Also the principles of the RAM and bios for Threadripper shouldn't have the same amount of issues but our internal IT department seem happy with them tbh.
Click to expand...

Yup - my college did the same for their rendering / game dev suite - replaced all the i5 systems with Ryzen. Can't recall seeing a single crash since they were installed.
 
gavinh87 said:
We've all seen how he tests ram :p
Click to expand...
You have Threadripper gavin?? No.

I do, I think that tells everyone everything. Infact I have had for months. Again tells a brief but accurate story.

If you check vortez you will see the memory sku you called out with my name on it reached 3722Mhz stable on ryzen by an independent reviewer and scooped all the awards. Best if independent guys test my product if I have zero credibility (but all the world records).

For those interested I will do zenith bundle with 3466Mhz mems and 3.8-3.9 oc on TR. Waiting for the board to hit retail first.
 
8 Pack said:
You have Threadripper gavin?? No.

I do, I think that tells everyone everything. Infact I have had for months. Again tells a brief but accurate story.

If you check vortez you will see the memory sku you called out with my name on it reached 3722Mhz stable on ryzen by an independent reviewer and scooped all the awards. Best if independent guys test my product if I have zero credibility (but all the world records).

For those interested I will do zenith bundle with 3466Mhz mems and 3.8-3.9 oc on TR. Waiting for the board to hit retail first.
Click to expand...

Because you have it means you know how test ram properly? You had ryzen a long time before us too and you failed HCI and tried to cover it up. Then subsequently went on an editing rampage and changed all my posts with me showing what you could not achieve.
I didn't call out your memory. I called out your claims and methodology; you were saying it was stable by posting a realbench screen. When you did use HCI, you didn't run 1 instance per thread and still failed.
You may have hit 3466 but if the timings are so high its slower than 3200CL14 and isn't stable then what is the point?

I checked hwbot and it seems your last world record was in 2015. Catzilla at 720p, you are like a man utd fan living on their past glory.

Are these 3.9's avx stable this time? I ask because the work loads these chips are designed for will use avx.

Also,on ryzen from vortez :
The 1800X held 3466MHz fine at 16-16-16-16-36-62-1T no problem (all running with 1.35V) and could boot with C16 3600MHz, but proved to be unstable in testing. Despite our efforts to get 3600MHz stable with various voltages and timings, this is the limitation of our 1800X CPU. We did however test this memory with the latest Ryzen 3 1300X CPU, and found that it held 3600MHz 16-18-18-18-38-72-1T, and 3722MHz 18-18-18-18-38-78-1T no problem, though this seemed like the absolute limit for the 1300X chip despite trying to boot in with 3866MHz.
Click to expand...

As you can see, they could not achieve said speeds on one chip but they could on the other.
This makes your claims invalid. What is achievable on one CPU doesn't translate to all CPU's. You know this but still make outlandish claims.
 
Last edited:
8 Pack said:
You have Threadripper gavin?? No.

I do, I think that tells everyone everything. Infact I have had for months. Again tells a brief but accurate story.

If you check vortez you will see the memory sku you called out with my name on it reached 3722Mhz stable on ryzen by an independent reviewer and scooped all the awards. Best if independent guys test my product if I have zero credibility (but all the world records).

For those interested I will do zenith bundle with 3466Mhz mems and 3.8-3.9 oc on TR. Waiting for the board to hit retail first.
Click to expand...

I know might be a long shot, but do you plan to make a package with the Asrock boards and 32GB (4x8) 3600Mhz ram (with tight subtimings) assuming the Asrock page is correct and the board can do 3600Mhz?
Cheers :D
 
gavinh87 said:
Because you have it means you know how test ram properly? You had ryzen a long time before us too and you failed HCI and tried to cover it up. Then subsequently went on an editing rampage and changed all my posts with me showing what you could not achieve.
I didn't call out your memory. I called out your claims and methodology; you were saying it was stable by posting a realbench screen. When you did use HCI, you didn't run 1 instance per thread and still failed.
You may have hit 3466 but if the timings are so high its slower than 3200CL14 and isn't stable then what is the point?

I checked hwbot and it seems your last world record was in 2015. Catzilla at 720p, you are like a man utd fan living on their past glory.

Are these 3.9's avx stable this time? I ask because the work loads these chips are designed for will use avx.

Also,on ryzen from vortez :


As you can see, they could not achieve said speeds on one chip but they could on the other.
This makes your claims invalid. What is achievable on one CPU doesn't translate to all CPU's. You know this but still make outlandish claims.
Click to expand...

You go, girl!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom