Pretty sure it was Rubens that made that decision not Ross - he said so in the post-race interview IIRCThe Honda was a very large exception in this race though with Ross Brawn's excellent extreme wet tyre choice.
That was my point. It didn't matter that Kovi had the second best car in F1 today.
Poppycock - if it was a new driver or someone without Rubens experience Id agree - but no doubt Rubens has the quality and experience to make those calls and override anything from Ross Brawn when it comes to the race there and then...its not his choice though, ok he may have input. but its the man ross brawn who's behind the whole operation
Today highlighted yet again how bad a driver Massa really is.
Yes, he's awful. As clearly demonstrated by the points they've all gathered this season...
... oh.... wait.
As has been pointed out before on here. Massa can only win if he leads from the off, if not, just start hoping he finishes in the points, or finishes at all.
Massa has a lead foot, simple as.
I vote to make all races run in the rain, makes them a lot more fun! I agree with Brundles comment saying that this race and other this season show that to make F1 more exciting they need to take away masses of grip.
Well the Ferrari looked snappy in the dry yesterday, it looked even worse in the wet today. Although strangely enough he was the fastest guy on track near the end of the race.
Just wait for all the "I got stuck in the car park", "poor facilites" etc stories over the next few days.
Its only when you compare the Silverstone facilities to other F1 tracks that you see how bad it really is. The pit complex and scaffold grandstands are laughable. Although the BRDC stand looks nice, shame they didn't put the money into the other facilities.
I do agree. However, most drivers cant even do that.
To score a lot of points in the WDC, you have to be a decent driver, which Massa is. That is the only explanation of why he is top of the WDC (and the fact that he has the best car, but then so does Kimi and McLaren's car isnt too bad either).
Put it this way.
Both Ferrari and Mclaren have decent cars, both of which are capable of winning races.
Between them, the top 3 drivers have an almost equal number of wins.
But whatabout the other Mclaren driver?
I'm afraid that people on this forum dont seem to want to look at facts. They allow their emotions to affect their judgement.
I cant remember the last time I saw any driver cross the finish line ahead of Hamilton in a wet race.
When Massa has a good race, he dominates the entire weekend (like he did at Bahrain).