Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 37,804
- Location
- block 16, cell 12
and Rooney and Berbatov were 9 and 5 years ago, what's your point?
Strikers are more expensive than midfielders generally, this is hardly a revelation.
I guess my point was that none of our strikers have just retired, unlike scholes for example or Hargreaves effectively. Leaving us with only Carrick and Anderson as senior first team centre midfielders and leaving us with the likes of Young and Valencia. I dislike both of those players too.
Up front we already had rooney, welbeck, hernandez so we then blew 22 million on RVP which is fine. But why buy a player to replace your best player (rvp to replace rooney) when you have so many inferior playes right across the midfield who could all easily be replaced with that sort of money.
When rooney complained about our aspirations he wanted people like 'don't pass me the ball' Park replacing or gigs or scholes, or Ronaldo...NOT ROONEY himself. He is literally better than 95% of the rest of the team, so you can understand how is he confused and angry that we are replacing him and not the other dross. (though thankfully our Korean nightmare has now disappeared).
Although buying jones and smalling was seen as being for the future, you cant play two young inexperienced centrebacks, so you cant really develop them, hence you shuffle them out side or into midfield, because you invested so much in them you left yourself with no money to fill out our midfield, or just not will power to flesh out our midfield any more.
Edit, also the most expensive player in the world was not a striker. neither was Figo, nor Zidane. Nor is bale. Neither was kaka.
Last edited: