Phate said:
Gibbo, would the Z06 have a faster 30-70 in 2nd than the 'Stang?
Hi there
The Z06 is a little quicker from a standstill to 100mph and far far quicker past 100mph. Z06 has posted as low at 3.6s 0-60mph and 7.5s for 0-100mph from a stock car. The quickest 1/4 mile time for a stock car is also 10.8s, only mod was drag tyres I think, wheras Z06's on street tyres with good drivers see 11.4-12s, again driver dependent. They are incredibly quick cars, the combination of a 512BHP engine, huge displacement so loads of torque but only weighing 1417kg makes it a very fast combo.
Gotta remember the Z06 is quite a beast, its as quick as a Mclaren SLR and quicker than the new 911 Turbo.
However on this kind of test its hard to say because the Z06's gearing might not help. You see in a Z06 1st gear gets you to 60mph and 2nd gear is about 93mph. Obviously 30-60mph is quicker in the Z06 if you use 1st gear but changing up to 2nd will hurt the time a bit. Then if you just use 2nd for this test your gonna be starting from low revs.
I'd say a Z06 doing this test in 2nd gear would match the Mustang. Fit a CAI kit to the Z06 and re-tune to UK fuel then its gonna beat the Mustang on this test even when just using its second gear.
From my Z06 experience it has a little more grunt at sub 100mph than the Mustang but is hugely quicker than the Stang past 100mph. In fact the Z06 felt supercharged because it had no flat spots and picked up very well from any rpm even in higher gears, but thats 7.0l engine for you.
The car I would like to see go against my Mustang would be the 911 Turbo of Spies. I know he would have me from a standstill with his AWD traction but I reckon from a roll of about 30mph upto 120mph there would be nothing in it, but obviously at speeds past 130mph the Porsche would be quicker due to far superior aero-dynamics.
