Is there any reason to avoid the x670 boards, with longevity in mind?
I don't anticipate OC, just thinking of future CPU. The expected longevity of AM5 is what's attracting me, is all.
X670 doesn't have PCI-E 5.0 graphics, but sometimes it does have more connectivity, e.g. MSI X670-P has 4x M.2 slots of which one is PCI-E 5.0 (most B650 boards have 2 or 3 M.2 slots) and 6x SATA (most boards only have 4).
The circumstances X670 makes sense are not... common, since B650E boards can be more feature rich. X670 Aorus Elite is another example, a well-built board, but feature rich? Not really.
The main reason to buy X670E instead of X670 is PCI-E 5.0 graphics and over B650E, 4x M.2 slots. The very highest-end boards also tend to be X670E, if you want features like 10Gb LAN & USB 4 (like the X670E Creator), but these kind of boards are £400+ and the impact on the rest of your build by eating that much of the budget on the board rarely makes sense.
Also reading mixed reports about certain brands and either Bios or RTM issues. Feels like a minefield! You've recommended Asus boards, so assume they're a safe bet?
Most of the early issues have been addressed now, but you do still have to be careful with memory choice.
Asus specifically: no, I'm not recommending Asus specifically, it just happens to be that the B650E-F is one of the cheapest decently equipped boards for someone that wants to "future proof" their PCI-E graphics & SSD. If you can find a cheaper board with those features, then I have zero objection. Just don't buy one of these and you're good:
See MSI QD-OLED Gaming Monitors: https://msi.gm/GetQDOLEDGo QD OLED Global: https://msi.gm/GoOLEDGlobalGo QD OLED Australians: https://msi.gm/GoOLEDSupport u...
www.youtube.com