• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

5800X Boost set to 5050Mhz all cores with AMD Curve Optimizer

Minstadave said:
Will give these a try, thanks.

I've been using +200mhz so far as, like you say, it gives me crazy SC boost (5.15ghz) but wouldn't mind sacrificing a little for better all core boosts.
Click to expand...

With those settings I get max core boost of 4.95Ghz.

When playing read dead usually 2 cores are at 4.95Ghz, and sometimes it shows all core 4.85Ghz boost for a couple for seconds.
 
Last edited:
Can you maybe check CP77 if you have it already (with all the bugs and stuff going on). It's so heavy on multi thread performance that for most setups all core OC is noticeably better (especially for 0.1% and 1% low) than PBO
 
cool, but if you have 1% low monitoring enabled in your OSD I can't see it ;) it's not about core utilisation & average fps, these are going to be fine with SMT patch & PBO, but overall experience and this is better with all core oc, I'll look up for examples later when I'm back home
 
1% low is labeled 1%L then AVG then max. Over 15 minute gaming session 1%L was 60FPS at the end of video.

I prefer the SMT patch not for any reason other than just incase when I run into a really bad area maybe 1% lows will be a little higher.

No difference with all core overclock @ 4900Mhz only all core I tried and just AMD curve Optimizer + PBO that I can tell.

The environments change so much it is really hard to tell especially when playing GPU limited. Possible 1% lows up 3FPS-5FPS over a 15 minute gaming session best that I can tell and pure guess o my part.

I will have to switch from AMD PC to Intel PC and check if there is a difference,just real lazy to do it.
 
ok, I checked it on proper screen and yea it's all visible ;) thanks
https://youtu.be/MuoSrLjppvs?t=130
something to compare, sorry it's in Polish and not mine so I won't argue about or defeat testing methodology, for me it's just additional information to consider, first half of the video is about SMT patch, second is OC vs PBO

and yea 1% is similar, 0.1% gets very low at times, but this guy is very focused and super fluent play as he's into Simracing where each ms matters ;)

side question, what OSD you are using? looks pretty amazing ;)
 
I watched the video,I can understand numbers in any language lol. Some people can not. hell some USA people can not do math problems if you change from miles to kilometers. Ok enough jokes.

I believe everything in the video and that is what he got.Which looks fine also. Like I said it is really hard to judge especially 1%Low/0.1%low. All I can say ,I am using the SMT patch and will continue to use it as I am guessing it helps with the 1% Lows and from my testing I am good with that 100%.I am very happy with CP77 now and the way it is running for me maxed out with DLSS Ultra.
I am playing on 4K LG OLED 65" and I can not see a real difference in screen quality.I can on 4K 27" Monitor.

My canned response foe the overlay,use latest MSI and Rtss. Also Yes MSI Afterburner and RTSS Overlay Editor, I done a quick start up guide for the OSD and uploaded it to google drive. Included in the read me a link to the creators tutorials of MSI Afterburner and RTSS Overlay Editor. IF you want to start from scratch his name is Alexey Nicolaychuk just search youtube . https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Flt2EeznPd2HO438678AbjUHnwWf6E6D/view?usp=sharing

Tags for changing stuff with MSI/RTSS
Time-<BTIME>
Framerate Max-<G=Framerate Max,-2,-2,1,0,300,28>
Framerate Average-<G=Framerate Avg,-2,-2,1,0,300,28>
Framerate min- Min\n<FRMIN> You can remove the /n

Can be used in MSI configs also

[## Tags, variables ##]
# <C> ------- color:
# <Cn=yyxxxxxx> -> <Cn>
# n ----------------- index number
# yy ---------------- alfa canal in hex
# xxxxxx ------------ color in hex
# <B=x,y> --- background
# <S> ------- text size in %:
# <Sn=50> ----------- superscript (íàäñòðî÷íûé);
# <Sn=-50> ---------- subscript (ïîäñòðî÷íûé).
# <A> ------- text alignment:
# <An=10> ----------- 10 symbols, left;
# <An=-10> ---------- 10 symbols, right.
# <P=x,y> --- position in pixels:
# x ----------------- horizontal;
# y ----------------- vertical.
# <APP> ----- used API ("VULKAN","OGL","D3D*")
# <FR> ------ FrameRate
# <FRMIN>, <FRAVG>, <FRMAX>,
# <FR10L>, <FR01L>
# <FT> ------ FrameTime
# <OBJ> ----- ?
#
# \n -------- line break (ïåðåíîñ ñòðîêè)
# \b -------- new column
# \t -------- indent (îòñòóï)
# \r -------- ?
#
# %CPU%, %FullCPU%, %RAM%, %GPU%, %FullGPU%, %Driver%, %Time%
# %FRAMETIME%, %FRAMERATE%,
 
mine would only do +100 PBO, anything else seem to blue screen on booting windows no matter the vcore / soc volts / fabric ect

I could just about run mine at 4725 all core or -5 / -9 curve for 4950 single threads not sure if it was fully stable tbh so much messing about with fabric volts for nothing. good bye little chip maybe when they sort the bios's out ill try again, msi bios was much much better then gigabyte masters btw. trying to get over 1900 FCLK was a joke :(
 
Going over 1900FCLK is not important at all.tuning the Ram is most important on Ryzen ,especially for PC gaming.It is so fun though to play with the Ram,I encourage to get the highest you can.

AMD Ryzen Fabric Clock 1467Mhz (DDR4 2933Mhz) vs Fabric Clock 1933Mhz (DDR4 3866Mhz) PC Games B-die Ram.
Test were done on 3800X

Battlefield 5 1920x1080

DDR4 2933 Mhz (1467 MHz)
AVG -143.8FPS
1%Low -82FPS
0.1%Low -58FPS


DDR4 3866 Mhz (1933 Mhz)
AVG -144.5FPS
1%Low -82FPS
0.1%Low -62FPS


Grand Theft Auto V 1920x1080

DDR4 2933 Mhz (1467 MHz)
AVG -112.6FPS
1%Low -73FPS
0.1%Low -28FPS


DDR4 3866 Mhz (1933 Mhz)
AVG -114.5FPS
1%Low -76FPS
0.1%Low -28FPS

Video of test side by side




Red Dead Redemption 2 1920x1080

DDR4 2933 Mhz (1467 MHz)
AVG -95.2FPS
Min -47.5FPS
1%Low -68.0FPS


DDR4 3866 Mhz (1933 Mhz)
AVG -97.0FPS
Min -47.2FPS
1%Low -70FPS


Sleeping Dogs 1920x1080

DDR4 2933 Mhz (1467 MHz)
AVG -239.4FPS
Min -108.2FPS
1%Low -118FPS


DDR4 3866 Mhz (1933 Mhz)
AVG -243.9FPS
Min -109.6FPS
1%Low -118FPS


Video of test side by side

 
cpu.jpg


Pretty happy with that. Thats with PBO set to +150mhz, everything else default other than XMP enabled.

Doesnt seem to run too hot either with an NZXT Kraken 360mm rad.
 
gerardfraser said:
Going over 1900FCLK is not important at all.tuning the Ram is most important on Ryzen ,especially for PC gaming.It is so fun though to play with the Ram,I encourage to get the highest you can.

AMD Ryzen Fabric Clock 1467Mhz (DDR4 2933Mhz) vs Fabric Clock 1933Mhz (DDR4 3866Mhz) PC Games B-die Ram.
Test were done on 3800X

Battlefield 5 1920x1080

DDR4 2933 Mhz (1467 MHz)
AVG -143.8FPS
1%Low -82FPS
0.1%Low -58FPS


DDR4 3866 Mhz (1933 Mhz)
AVG -144.5FPS
1%Low -82FPS
0.1%Low -62FPS


Grand Theft Auto V 1920x1080

DDR4 2933 Mhz (1467 MHz)
AVG -112.6FPS
1%Low -73FPS
0.1%Low -28FPS


DDR4 3866 Mhz (1933 Mhz)
AVG -114.5FPS
1%Low -76FPS
0.1%Low -28FPS

Video of test side by side




Red Dead Redemption 2 1920x1080

DDR4 2933 Mhz (1467 MHz)
AVG -95.2FPS
Min -47.5FPS
1%Low -68.0FPS


DDR4 3866 Mhz (1933 Mhz)
AVG -97.0FPS
Min -47.2FPS
1%Low -70FPS


Sleeping Dogs 1920x1080

DDR4 2933 Mhz (1467 MHz)
AVG -239.4FPS
Min -108.2FPS
1%Low -118FPS


DDR4 3866 Mhz (1933 Mhz)
AVG -243.9FPS
Min -109.6FPS
1%Low -118FPS


Video of test side by side

Click to expand...
Good tests to see side by side.
Have you ever tried changing from CL16 to tighter / looser timings? (CL14 / 18)
I noticed much more of a difference going to 3600Mhz CL14 than going 3800Mhz CL16. 4000 CL16 results in lower fps than what im at now (3800Mhz, CL14)
 
I'm pretty sure that 4000 CL16 may be still rather unstable, or limited in performance to maintain stability and that's why you see issues while gaming, especially with fps drops/shutter kind of things.
 
Guest2 said:
DLSS on ultra performance though. Looks disgusting
Try performance, much better looking :)
Click to expand...

You can say whatever you want.Do you really think I did not test every setting in the game.

Guest2 said:
Good tests to see side by side.
Have you ever tried changing from CL16 to tighter / looser timings? (CL14 / 18)
I noticed much more of a difference going to 3600Mhz CL14 than going 3800Mhz CL16. 4000 CL16 results in lower fps than what im at now (3800Mhz, CL14)
Click to expand...

I have tested all ram speeds from DDR4 CL10 2133Mhz-DDR4 CL14 4200Mhz. I believe whatever you say for yourself from your own testing.
I got an idea how it works with PC gaming.
 
gerardfraser said:
You can say whatever you want.Do you really think I did not test every setting in the game.



I have tested all ram speeds from DDR4 CL10 2133Mhz-DDR4 CL14 4200Mhz. I believe whatever you say for yourself from your own testing.
I got an idea how it works with PC gaming.
Click to expand...

Thanks, I can. I was just commenting that Ultra DLSS is too harsh and performance looks nicer.

"I believe whatever you say for yourself from your own testing. I got an idea how it works with PC gaming" What? This doesn't make sense at all :D

ukbionic said:
Getting quite low cinebench r20 multi core. Round 5700. But boosts up to 5050mhz? Ryzen is fiddly thinking of just sticking to it
Click to expand...

6000 should be around right for 5800X PBO on auto with all cores boosting to 4.5Ghz. Try leaving it on defaults
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom