Why?
9/11 15 Year Anniversary
- Thread starter Craig1981
- Start date
Why?
Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Aug 2005
- Posts
- 3,970
- Location
- Uranus
Iam not going into detail but a lot of things dont add up and there are far too many coincidences for it tobe a straight 4 plane hijacking that flew into 3 buildings.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2003
- Posts
- 57,371
- Location
- Stoke on Trent
Well the title of the thread has been left open for debate and the OP hasn't asked for it to be a Rememberance thread so start your own.
I do love conspiracy theorists. Most theories I could pick apart but I'm bored with it all now. Steel don't melt, buildings don't fall like that, no plane debris, blah blah blah.
15 years after the fact and not on piece of credible evidence exists. No white knight leaking details, no hacks uncovering the 'cover up'. The hundreds if not thousands of people that would have been involved in such a plot and nothing. Zilch.
Tell one other person that you're cheating on your wife and you can guarantee she will know by the next day. Secrets don't exist nowadays if more than one person knows.
15 years after the fact and not on piece of credible evidence exists. No white knight leaking details, no hacks uncovering the 'cover up'. The hundreds if not thousands of people that would have been involved in such a plot and nothing. Zilch.
Tell one other person that you're cheating on your wife and you can guarantee she will know by the next day. Secrets don't exist nowadays if more than one person knows.
No because all them sexy details were in building 7!
Not to mention the files on the 2 trillion that Dick Cheneys crew squandered on black ops, which by the fate of god the files were in building 7.
Not to mention that Larry A. Silverstein insured the 2 buildings for the attack.
Doubled it for the attack, insurance companies complained but he got a mega pay out X2.
A small fact that the buildings were condemned due to asbestos used in fire the retardant.
It stinks one day we will find out, I will probably be dead but one day we will know.
I don't care who it was they are absolute *******s.
Its a long dark rabbit hole that goes very deep, I don't have facts but I know one thing, it stinks to high heaven.
What do you think it would take an ordinary media sheep to believe your version versus their own?
Its interesting, I think there is a hell of a lot about the day we are not being told about. There is a hell of a lot more that we find out around the incident but nothing concrete that says: We planned this and this is what we did.
If we ever find the Operation XX file fair enough. But until then, I think anyone not keeping an open mind about serious circumstantial evidence is very naïve indeed.
I'm quite ambivalent and switch between a combination of the "narrative" and the "that doesn't sound right".
I read somewhere that only three very high rise skyscraper type structures collapsed due to fire damage and all were on 9/11. How true that is I don't know, but I'm sure a google search of either persuasion would be incorrect.
Last time I checked, I don't run General Discussion. I DID start the thread as a remembrance thread as it happens, but if people want to turn it into a whacky conspiracy theory discussion instead, who am I to say they cant?
Not true. He had an insurance policy in place for both buildings with a maximum limit of one building per event. So only one building got paid out. On advice from his advisors saying that losing both buildings in event was never going to happen.
He took the insurance companies to court and lost.
Company I work for co-insured the buildings.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2003
- Posts
- 57,371
- Location
- Stoke on Trent
Well if that's how you meant it to be then ask the Mods to remove all none RIP posts.
Fair play Craig.
Interesting, might I ask for a source for this information please Balky? As I did hear they argued there were two separate events and he got something like $Xbn per one?
Soldato
- Joined
- 24 Aug 2005
- Posts
- 3,970
- Location
- Uranus
They collapsed at freefall speed into their own footprint, nothing dodgy about that buildings do it all the time.(even the one that wasnt hit by a plane).
You know what this place is like dm.
People who want to commemorate can still do that and ignore the back and forth.
Not sure what you are saying? You saying the building came down in the controlled demolition argument?
I find it odd that when a plane hit the building they did come straight down but when Superman slammed General Zod through multiple skyscrapers they all came down at angles.
Soldato
- Joined
- 9 Jun 2005
- Posts
- 4,698
- Location
- Wiltshire
Fair play Craig.
Interesting, might I ask for a source for this information please Balky? As I did hear they argued there were two separate events and he got something like $Xbn per one?
My word as an insurance professional not enough?
not totally black and white as two insurance policies were in force. Which then started big issues within insurance market and Marsh's (Broker for WTC insurance) E&O policy got put on the line.But here you go: http://edition.cnn.com/2004/LAW/04/29/attacks.insurance/index.html?eref=sitesearch