Nvidia don't exist to me anymore
"How many?.....Nine........Nine huh!!?!?!?...Nine Maverick bars!!! and you say this is nothing??!!"
Last edited:
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Nvidia don't exist to me anymore
"How many?.....Nine........Nine huh!!?!?!?...Nine Marerick bars!!! and you say this is nothing??!!"
not sure if this has been linked?
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphi...ory-Performance/COD-Advanced-Warfare-and-Clos
PCPER FCAT results - showing , greater frame variance on the GTX 970
I spent nearly the entirety of two days testing the GeForce GTX 970 and trying to replicate some of the consumer complaints centered around the memory issue we discussed all week. I would say my results are more open ended than I expected. In both BF4 and in CoD: Advanced Warfare I was able to find performance settings that indicated the GTX 970 was more apt to stutter than the GTX 980. In both cases, the in-game settings were exceptionally high, going in the sub-25 FPS range and those just aren't realistic. A PC gamer isn't going to run at those frame rates on purpose and thus I can't quite convince myself to get upset about it.
not sure if this has been linked?
http://www.pcper.com/reviews/Graphi...ory-Performance/COD-Advanced-Warfare-and-Clos
PCPER FCAT results - showing , greater frame variance on the GTX 970
Makes you wonder if 'Nvidia Game Ready' drivers are actually just drivers to limit newer games from using too much VRam on the 970.
Frankly i wouldnt put anything past nvidia right now.
remember in 3dmark where the driver removed all off rail rendering to get a higher score??
Sorry but that's completely wrong and you should research before posting such statements, as there is already enough confused people in here.
The top end AMD CPU gets beaten by an i3 occasionally, so saying an AMD CPU will be fine and the difference in gaming isn't that much is so wrong. You can save the money to buy a better GPU but you will be bottlenecking your new shiny GPU that you put the extra cash to.
For a budget GPU, an AMD CPU will do just fine but for a decent GPU, Intel all the way or suffer a bottleneck.
Does not look edited.
I have been experiencing intermittent problem with my graphics card within a game where it totally locks up the PC forcing me to hit the reset button. I know 100% that it is the Graphics card causing this and I have a Inno 3D GTX 970, is this problem likely to be related?
Sorry but that's completely wrong and you should research before posting such statements, as there is already enough confused people in here.
The top end AMD CPU gets beaten by an i3 occasionally, so saying an AMD CPU will be fine and the difference in gaming isn't that much is so wrong. You can save the money to buy a better GPU but you will be bottlenecking your new shiny GPU that you put the extra cash to.
For a budget GPU, an AMD CPU will do just fine but for a decent GPU, Intel all the way or suffer a bottleneck.
I have been experiencing intermittent problem with my graphics card within a game where it totally locks up the PC forcing me to hit the reset button. I know 100% that it is the Graphics card causing this and I have a Inno 3D GTX 970, is this problem likely to be related?
still going to get 970 as im tired of using spare 4870 for ages now, i doubt i will get in any issues at 1080p 120hz and anyway 970 probably will be short lived when 16nm will come out next year.
I'd say its very unlikely that the issue's being discussed in this thread is the cause that problem.
If your positive its the GPU that's locking up the computer and you've tried the normal trouble shooting; reinstalled drivers, removed any overclock, ran a virus/malware scan etc then its probably time to look into returning the card.