• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

970's having performance issues using 4GB Vram - Nvidia investigating

Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes OcUK and Caseking are happy to give refunds, most competitors are still refusing however from user comments about competitors on NVIDIA forums.

Thanks Gibbo, as I bought two back on 19th Sept from yourselves. How long do I have to return them as I'm currently abroad and won't be back in UK until 20th Feb?
 
I bet AMD wish they had something to release right now they would make a killing. Personally I am gutted about the whole situation but top marks to OCUK for the best customer service on the web!
 
Have to say, I think Gibbo, OCUK and Caseking have gone above and beyond their call of duty in this matter. Very well done.

Agree with you there mate, great stuff from OcUK team. The only time I've not ordered was because I was saving on postage, but its actions like this over the Nvida cards makes me rethink the couple of quid I save in postage.
 
Nearly all gone!

I am trying to get a killer deal on 8GB 290X, awaiting feedback next week, but would be nice to hit £299 on the 8GB 290X, so will see what Monday brings. :)
How does it genuinely compare to the 970 though, @ 1440p+ going forwards? You are still singing the 970's praises (and it is by no means a bad card I agree), so is the 290X actually a good option, really? I've been told you need x2 of them to actually get the benefit of 8GB, but my PSU/case wouldn't like that. Plus lots of moaning about excess heat. I never recall reading a review of the 970 that said the 290X was even worth considering as an alternative, but now suddenly they seem to be in favour?! Is it a knee jerk reaction?
 
How does it genuinely compare to the 970 though, @ 1440p+ going forwards? You are still singing the 970's praises (and it is by no means a bad card I agree), so is the 290X actually a good option, really? I've been told you need x2 of them to actually get the benefit of 8GB, but my PSU/case wouldn't like that. Plus lots of moaning about excess heat. I never recall reading a review of the 970 that said the 290X was even worth considering as an alternative, but now suddenly they seem to be in favour?! Is it a knee jerk reaction?

As previously said 970 is super but not recommended for 4k.

290X 8GB is a very viable solution for 4k, especially 2-3 of them, enough GPU horsepower and you won't run out of memory, any resolution below won't be an issue.

970 does not have enough memory for 4k or horsepower and even though the 980 is better it's still going to run out of memory at 4k resolution, maybe even 1440P in some games.

At 1440P or lower single card the 970 is faster gaming card and cost less, the 290X might edge it in a few games but on the whole the 970 is ahead.

But higher resolutions enjoy the 290X 512-bit bandwidth and 8GB memory.
 
How does it genuinely compare to the 970 though, @ 1440p+ going forwards? You are still singing the 970's praises (and it is by no means a bad card I agree), so is the 290X actually a good option, really? I've been told you need x2 of them to actually get the benefit of 8GB, but my PSU/case wouldn't like that. Plus lots of moaning about excess heat. I never recall reading a review of the 970 that said the 290X was even worth considering as an alternative, but now suddenly they seem to be in favour?! Is it a knee jerk reaction?

290Xs do produce more heat than a 970 but providing you have good air flow it is not a problem.

If you think you are running out of memory on a 970, then with an 8gb 290X there is no chance of this happening again.

To get the most out of an 8gb 290X @2160p you need 2 or more yes but from what I can make out this is not the problem 970 owners are unhappy about.

8gb is fantastic for future proofing too as I think that most next gen cards won't even have that much memory.
 
290Xs do produce more heat than a 970 but providing you have good air flow it is not a problem.

If you think you are running out of memory on a 970, then with an 8gb 290X there is no chance of this happening again.

To get the most out of an 8gb 290X @2160p you need 2 or more yes but from what I can make out this is not the problem 970 owners are unhappy about.

8gb is fantastic for future proofing too as I think that most next gen cards won't even have that much memory.

If I was building a dream PC it would have three 290X 8GB in it with a 3440x1440 monitor, nuff said, enough horsepower and enough VRAM to never run out.

But remember this AMD crossfire works far better on X79/X99 platform as it's silky smooth, but on Z97 it can suffer from stutter, something Freesync might remedy though.
 
If I was building a dream PC it would have three 290X 8GB in it with a 3440x1440 monitor, nuff said, enough horsepower and enough VRAM to never run out.

But remember this AMD crossfire works far better on X79/X99 platform as it's silky smooth, but on Z97 it can suffer from stutter, something Freesync might remedy though.

Glad I'm not paying your electricity bill :p
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom