Great, what about his wife and seven kids living on state handouts?
This, they should be cut off too. Heck I was hoping they'd be on the plane with him
Great, what about his wife and seven kids living on state handouts?
Great, what about his wife and seven kids living on state handouts?
Well, luckily we do not live in a Country that ascribes to a "Sins of the Father" mentality.
"The apple doesn't fall far from the tree"
I bet you life that the police keeps very close eye on the kids to make sure they're not following in daddies footsteps
Which is simply rubbish. I'm nothing like either of my parents in temperament or attitudes.
.
I assume you probably weren't brainwashed by them either?
Which is simply rubbish.
A guy who was never charged with anything in the UK spent many years in prison without a trial, was not allowed to see the evidence the SIAC were judging him on or even meet with the person acting as his advocate. After being granted bail the SIAC later rescinded it not because he'd broken the conditions but becuase they thought he might do so in the future.
This is all apparently ok because we don't like him and he's branded a terrorist. Reagrdless of who he is I think this is pretty disgusting treatment and a poor reflection on British justice.
A guy who was never charged with anything in the UK spent many years in prison without a trial, was not allowed to see the evidence the SIAC were judging him on or even meet with the person acting as his advocate. After being granted bail the SIAC later rescinded it not because he'd broken the conditions but becuase they thought he might do so in the future.
This is all apparently ok because we don't like him and he's branded a terrorist. Reagrdless of who he is I think this is pretty disgusting treatment and a poor reflection on British justice.
He actually did nothing wrong all he did was just hate speech. He didn't bomb or commit any actual crime.
Tapes of his sermons were later discovered in a Hamburg flat used by the 9/11 hijackers
A guy who was never charged with anything in the UK spent many years in prison without a trial, was not allowed to see the evidence the SIAC were judging him on or even meet with the person acting as his advocate. After being granted bail the SIAC later rescinded it not because he'd broken the conditions but becuase they thought he might do so in the future.
This is all apparently ok because we don't like him and he's branded a terrorist. Reagrdless of who he is I think this is pretty disgusting treatment and a poor reflection on British justice.
He actually did nothing wrong all he did was just hate speech. He didn't bomb or commit any actual crime.
A guy who was never charged with anything in the UK spent many years in prison without a trial, was not allowed to see the evidence the SIAC were judging him on or even meet with the person acting as his advocate. After being granted bail the SIAC later rescinded it not because he'd broken the conditions but becuase they thought he might do so in the future.
This is all apparently ok because we don't like him and he's branded a terrorist. Reagrdless of who he is I think this is pretty disgusting treatment and a poor reflection on British justice.