So I got impatient and started to change the front end already!
I was using the following comparison http://yojimg.net/bike/web_tools/stem.php
I can slam my stem (left one 5mm spacer under and haven’t cut it yet) and compensate with the spacers under the pads now.
I have removed 20mm of spacers from the stem, so adding those back under the pads means (I think) that it doesn’t change anything geometry wise aside from the brake hoods obviously being lower/more reach.
I need some new cable outers before I can do the gear cables, one was a little short previously and I might as well add a small amount of length while I can.
Maybe it’s worth just riding it fixed gear on the turbo while I at least get the front end in the ballpark before cabling.
Richmond Park TT this morning. I've not done much TT-specific training this year, mostly shorter intervals under 10mins and climbs under 20mins.
Came out with a 2 second PB over last year with 3W difference which is within ±2% accuracy of a Stages. So many factors that could have affected things such as smoother tarmac on resurfaced sections of the course, a strong wind compared to last year and about 5 seconds where I had to ease the Watts because a car was in the way.
Congrats again to @Thomas. PLease. on victory in the Road Bike cat.
Just won an Aerocoach 58T Arc ring on ebay, so pretty much final step to my aero puzzle! Should be on in time for the 50 I have a week on Sunday :S
Cheers Liam, the first time i've managed to win one of them, despite years of trying. Seem to have hit a bit of form at the moment.
I'll preface this by pointing out that I'm rubbish at TTs and have no idea what I'm talking about:
I'd say the difference is nothing aero, just where and how you use your power.
Looking at the first 2.2 miles of the race (and assuming that your ride has the correct elevation profile because his is different and doesnt match up with the speeds).
You've stuck strictly to your average power pretty much constantly whereas he has coasted down the hill a bit at under 200watts. You're ahead after this section (look at the total times taken rather than the average speed calculated by strava - i think the autopause or pickup time off the start line has messed that figure up a bit) but you've used 30watts more on average to get there. Drag increases exponentially with speed, so even though you were slightly faster down the hill, you've used a lot more power to do that.
Then look at the following 10 miles from this point to the turn.
This is where he made up almost all of the time on you - there's not much difference in times on the return leg.
Having rested a little on the first descent, he is now putting out a bit more power (17watts more) on the flatter section which results in a higher average speed. You can see a small dip in power and increase in speed again where he takes a short break on a descent around 7 miles.
Overall, average power is not much different between the 2 of you but he the way that you've used the power is different. Conservation of momentum is the most important thing so pushing a little harder on the climbs and easing back on the descents.
Something I've wanted to have a proper go at for a while, attempting a road bike sub 20 10m TT. Must have been a decent night on the A3 last night as I managed it on the first go with a 19.50. Well chuffed with that. Good enough for 10th with everyone else on TT bikes.
https://www.strava.com/activities/2521320244
56:05 for a 25?
Completing an hour in under an hour would be fast!
I don't know if this is the correct place but i'd thought i'd share.
A good workmate of mine used to Hill climb/race/TT's back in the day, (82 on) these are some of the pics he showed me and time.
He's still great on the hills at 64!