Associate
- Joined
- 10 Sep 2006
- Posts
- 400
was very bored and typed a load of rubbish (don't worry wasn't cheeky)
Last edited:
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Richdog said:I had a similar experience with a bloke called Andy at OCUK, he was difficult on the phone, arguing over my decision to return an unopened unwanted motherboard wwell within the 7 day grace period. Definately don't expect to be talked to like that when dealing with ANY company, it's downright rude and unprofessional. .
EDIT - Not slagging OCUK off at all, that was just my experience.
i feel the same way m8, the same thing has happed to me beforelocutus12 said:i think most of us have had a similar experience at some point or another...
between having a GTO2 arrive in an undersized jiffy bag with the receipt scrunched into a ball, to the more recent episode of waiting 7 weeks for an RMA only to have it sorted when i caught a person lying to me down the phone claiming there was no one available in the RMA department and that it was in a seperate building... connect 3D were kind enough to give me a direct line to the supposed different building with no one in it i was quite suprised when i got through to the same people, so were they.
basically the guy just didnt want to tell me that my RMA`d card had sat in OCUK for 6 weeks before it was finally posted off to be repaired which having worked in customer services myself was understandable given i went off like a small nuke. Although the main thing should be noted that in the end a replacement was sent, but im sure it would have dragged on for another couple of months had i not of started making phone calls to OCUK, connect 3D and a few other places to try to locate my card.
This asside i still shop at OCUK as when it comes to graphics cards most of the time they are equally priced if not cheaper and for me its a case of better the devil you know. On this basis i try not to break the forum rules, besides which if you wish to inform someone of a cheaper place to buy a product there is no need to break a forum rule and post about it, e-mail is just as effective.
but given the usual difference is probably only a couple of pounds between OCUK and said competitor... i apply the former "better the devil you know" aproach. True its not exactly a ringing endorsement but this is how i feel now when i shop with OCUK.
if they had good customer / RMA service all the time and had treated my purchased items with a little more respect then i would have a little bit more of an optimistically loyal view towards OCUK regardless of whether they were cheaper or not.
p.s. i would not of known about OCUK without these forums, proof that they generate money.
WJA96 said:I don't have a problem with what's said - but I do have a problem with how it's said.
devilkazuya said:i gather this ruling does not include mentioning items that OCUK does not stock, like talking about places that sell grado headphones for example
Yewen said:ernysmuntz you can voice an opinion on anything to do with the forums.
Just email a moderator if its relating to the forums, or email the shop if it is shop related.
Feel free to email me if you wish to discuss things further, we are not unreasonable its just publically advertising competitors that is the issue.
Not major sensorship really, its all just about OcUK here which is perfectly understandable.
Minstadave said:Thats fine, aslong as they don't sell other things that OcUK do.
fish99 said:Actually I would say it wouldn't be fine because OcUK also sell headphones. If someone posts asking for headphone recommendations and you posted 'you can get grado sr80 for £xx at xxxx shop' then that's against the rules. Also the shop in question could well sell some of the same headphones OcUK do, since OcUK do sell Sennheisers.
matt100 said:my word what a depressing thread
I think I could sum up by suggesting rather than posting snotty and frankly rather rude threads with a bunch of threats in them, why not actually ACT on the threat and suspend twice then ban anyone who breaks the rule.
Its not as if ocuk are short of members so you could stand to lose a few and tbh I'm sure after the second warning letting the user know the next time would result in an IP ban you'd get compliance.
All this thread serves to do is make ocuk look slightly more petty than usual, the idiots will still post competitors, I guarantee it, in fact give me decent odds and I'll put money on it.. otherwise why would you have to have so many underbosses and dons to police the (welcome) swearing and sig size rules when that also is in your FAQ..
Morons don't read..
tbh this thread smacks of a middle management sign saying something along the lines of "please leave these facilities how you would like to find them" etc... irritating when you read it and instantly forgetable.
easyrider said:We all know how to use google....
Mekrel said:Your forgetting though that this has been brought up in the past many atime, last person to do so was Marshy and still even after so many warnings etc, it is still broken to this day. Why do they have to keep giving out more warnings to be ignored?
All you have to worry about is yourself, I couldn't give a flying **** if some moron doesn't read the rules or breaks them when knowing better. Aslong as I'm safe.
As for "It's the attitude that I don't like, not the rule" kodswallop, simply - they pay for the forums, their rules, their attitude. If people didn't like it as much as they say, then why are they not leaving the forums? Grow some round things between your legs instead of posting about not liking it. (Not directed to you Matt100 by the way, just the generic few who seem to have so much of a problem).