• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD Navi 23 ‘NVIDIA Killer’ GPU Rumored to Support Hardware Ray Tracing, Coming Next Year

Status
Not open for further replies.
If its meandering around the level of 3080, both beating one another in select cases, its a great achievement to get from a 5700XT to this. They need to have stock and it be around £600 then its job done.
Realistically, even being in stock reliably for £700 would be quite a strong proposition until 2021, don't you think?
 
If its meandering around the level of 3080, both beating one another in select cases, its a great achievement to get from a 5700XT to this. They need to have stock and it be around £600 then its job done.

Absolutely. If they have stock then £650 would be fine too, seeing as 3080 isn't really available and certainly not at the RRP.
 
Realistically, even being in stock reliably for £700 would be quite a strong proposition until 2021, don't you think?

Yes I know but even for AMD lovers, if nvidia can charge £649 for their 'flagship' card, considering they do have the usual suspects I dont need to mention in the locker for proprietary reasons, the streaming thing + the noise cancellation thing; then they cant and would be stupid to price at the same or above.

They need to offer more than the card if they want to go that route, possibly a big game bundle and other sweeteners maybe?
 

I don't know enough about how they approached the feature implementations in Time Spy - I'd hope some of the shader refinements gave an improvement in performance from FSU to Time Spy compared to RDNA 1 but I can't be sure.

Ok.. building a scenario here.
Below are stats for Rx 5700 xt
FSU 6060
TS 9334
Source: https://www.guru3d.com/articles_pages/geforce_rtx_3080_founder_review,27.html

Rx 6800 xt (assumed)
FSU 11500
TS 18600 (5% increased scaling)

RTX3080 TS 17832
RTX3090 TS 20144
Source: https://www.guru3d.com/articles-pages/geforce-rtx-3090-founder-review,27.html
 
Last edited:
Yes I know but even for AMD lovers, if nvidia can charge £649 for their 'flagship' card, considering they do have the usual suspects I dont need to mention in the locker for proprietary reasons, the streaming thing + the noise cancellation thing; then they cant and would be stupid to price at the same or above.

They need to offer more than the card if they want to go that route, possibly a big game bundle and other sweeteners maybe?
I get you. It's just hard to see 3080s sold for £750 and up and think that AMD, if they've got good supply, will happily lob them out for £600 or less.

AMD were a bit bold in pricing Zen 3, let's see what they reckon here...
 
6800xt, allegedly

Going by the angles and spread on those memory traces that is quite a big core probably - 480-530mm2.

(Those kind of traces are done in a specific way for signal routing reasons to protect against interference, etc.)

EDIT: Dunno where the 6800xt bit comes from though - the source only mentions 6000 series.
 
AMD were a bit bold in pricing Zen 3, let's see what they reckon here...

I followed Ryzen but didnt upgrade till 3000 series. AMD built the cores and speed gradually refining it, they offered the zen and zen+ cheaper till they caught intel. This is the same approach I think they will do with Radeon, they cant charge the same till its the same performance and even then they only got bolder with Zen this time as it is purely better than intel and the mindshare is now established (took them a while to grow it).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom