Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
the firestrike bench, was that an AMD one or AIB?
the firestrike bench, was that an AMD one or AIB?
BUT, it doesn mater what should or shouldnt', it is and that was the best AMD could do just over 1 year ago... and now in 1 year they've managed to possibly double that performance, I must be the only one impressed with this and the possibility of them over taking an arch rival from so far behind it looked like they were gone forever.
However, wish I've not said anything now, as with the forums, we get bogged down in things now... barely anyone can make a normal comment i.e. 100% performance increase over 5700xt being impressive and somehow this is now a conversation where I'm justiofying a bog standard statement. lol
Motion carried, e-mailing Lisa Su...Seconded
So, when AMD release this new card at a much higher price point than the card it's "replacing". By your own logic they'll probably have caused one of the highest gen on gen price increases. If we don't take into context what the 5700XT is, then we have to be extremely negative about the price increase surely?
Nvidia set prices, until its AMD doing that we should be having a go at them for it.
In the context the Nvidia card is cheaper than last generation. So Nvidia would have a negative gen on gen price increase, while AMD's would be massively increased.
This doesn't make any sense to the comment.
In the context the Nvidia card is cheaper than last generation. So Nvidia would have a negative gen on gen price increase, while AMD's would be massively increased.
Or we acknowledge what the 5700XT was, take the new card in isolation from AMD's previous stuff and judge it on its merits/negatives to Nvidia's current line up (Which is my stance)
The nvidia card is not cheaper as Turing broke the mold, look at the graph that was shown in this thread, you can see Jensen worked his magic if you believe they made it cheaper - its just back to where it was IMO.
The 5700XT cost less than the 2070, which is what it was comparable to. Yes AMD tried to charge £50 more before releasing it, we all screamed at them and they backed down.
If RDNA2 has better price to performance than Ampere what should we do?
So, when AMD release this new card at a much higher price point than the card it's "replacing". By your own logic they'll probably have caused one of the highest gen on gen price increases. If we don't take into context what the 5700XT is, then we have to be extremely negative about the price increase surely?
Graphic card prices are crap all around IMO from both vendor's and will be going into this next generation with both taking turns to exploit the consumer.
AMD backed down their price because Nvidia pulled their pants down with the super's.
If RDNA 2 offers better price/performance, you do exactly as I said and compare it to Nvidia's offerings, not the 5700XT as is what I was saying.
The nvidia card is not cheaper as Turing broke the mold, look at the graph that was shown in this thread (@danlightbulb ?), you can see Jensen worked his magic if you believe they made it cheaper - its just back to where it was IMO.