• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

AMD on the road to recovery.

jigger said:
AMD can’t charge too much for their parts as all that really achieves is to increase Intels market share and slow growth for AMD. Look at Nvidia they have been increasing price no end as mechanism to accumulate, but even after decades Nvidia have hardly made a dent in Intel monopoly. Nvidia have just grown the market for Intel to retake.

AMD can have the fastest, cheapest, bestest CPU, GPU, APU by a factor of three and Intel still wins with garbage. That’s not to say AMD wouldn’t have success but, it’s never going to be 50/50 market share between AMD and Intel. Not even close.
Click to expand...
LMAO
 
jigger said:
www.statista.com

PC GPU vendor market share by quarter 2023 | Statista

As of the fourth quarter of 2023, Intel was the biggest vendor in the PC GPU market worldwide, occupying 67 percent of the market.
www.statista.com www.statista.com

www.statista.com

Intel/AMD x86 laptop CPU market share 2024 | Statista

Intel processors made up 71 percent of laptop central processing units (CPUs) test benchmark results in the third quarter of 2024, up from the higher share seen in previous quarters but lower compared to the last quarter.
www.statista.com www.statista.com

www.statista.com

Top semiconductor foundries market share 2024 | Statista

In the first quarter of 2024, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company (TSMC) recorded a market share of 61.7 percent in the global semiconductor foundry market, while Samsung occupied 11 percent of the market.
www.statista.com www.statista.com

AMD and Nvidia must pay for their admission into Intels market. How dare they steal double digit percentages from Intels pocket. The mechanism that allows this? TSMC. So Intel have decided to take on TSMC.
Click to expand...

Can't see any of it, all you get is this BS....


gpahRgd.png
 
Last edited:
humbug said:
Can't see any of it, all you get is this BS....


gpahRgd.png
Click to expand...

Strange the links work for me.

GPU market 67% Intel.
CPU market 71% Intel.
Semiconductor market 61.7% TSMC.

Intel has been ploughing its resources into taking the market from TSMC. Which make business sense as Intel already own the other markets and by muscling in in on TSMC Intel get to drink everyone’s juice even in markets Intel don’t operate. A nice little fringe benefit that in itself is worth more than Intels investment without the government aid they receive.
 
Last edited:
jigger said:
Strange the links work for me.

GPU market 67% Intel.
CPU market 71% Intel.
Semiconductor market 61.7% TSMC.

Intel has been ploughing its resources into taking the market from TSMC. Which make business sense as Intel already own the other markets and by muscling in TSMC Intel get to drink everyone’s juice even in markets Intel don’t operate. A nice little fringe benefit that in itself worth more than Intels investment without the government aid they receive.
Click to expand...

You know why that says GPU market share: Intel 67%? Because the people who came up these statistics don't understand the thing they are making statistics about, and people pay for this crap.... :cry:

They are double counting CPU's with iGPU's in them, they count them once for the CPU and then again for the iGPU on that CPU.
 
Anyway yes you're right, it proves Intel are still dominant so there is a lot more _____ that needs heading their way yet. Keep it coming....

Where's the popcorn?
 
Last edited:
humbug said:
You know why that says GPU market share: Intel 67%? Because the people who came up these statistics don't understand the thing they are making statistics about, and people pay for this crap.... :cry:

They are double counting CPU's with iGPU's in them, they count them once for the CPU and then again for the iGPU on that CPU.
Click to expand...

That is the dominant driving factor within market and where the money is for Intel. It’s also a massive flex and example of just how far are ahead of everyone else combined Intel still are. The big money move and what cements Intel is at TSMC. Growth elsewhere is chicken feed to Intel. Garbage is more than good enough to maintain Intels dominance for now. If Pat can thread this needle and execute the strategy, Intel can control the industry and Intel can throttle the competition.
 
Last edited:
jigger said:
That is the dominant driving factor within market and where the money is for Intel. It’s also a massive flex and example of just how far are ahead of everyone else combined. The big money move and what cements Intel is at TSMC. Growth elsewhere is chicken feed to Intel. Garbage is more than good enough to maintain Intels dominance for now. If Pat can thread this needle and execute the strategy, Intel can control the industry and Intel can throttle the competition.
Click to expand...
It must be time for your meds
 
jigger said:
That is the dominant driving factor within market and where the money is for Intel. It’s also a massive flex and example of just how far are ahead of everyone else combined Intel still are. The big money move and what cements Intel is at TSMC. Growth elsewhere is chicken feed to Intel. Garbage is more than good enough to maintain Intels dominance for now. If Pat can thread this needle and execute the strategy, Intel can control the industry and Intel can throttle the competition.
Click to expand...
Your missing that huge % of the gpu as noted is in the CPU and just collected but if you looked at the overlap of nvidia and AMD dedicated GPU to those machines the gpu % would be lower and they really aren't a GPU player yet. So it's a silly statistic to compare at all.
 
Curlyriff said:
Your missing that huge % of the gpu as noted is in the CPU and just collected but if you looked at the overlap of nvidia and AMD dedicated GPU to those machines the gpu % would be lower and they really aren't a GPU player yet. So it's a silly statistic to compare at all.
Click to expand...

It’s not silly at all. Intel are barely a GPU manufacturer but still own the GPU market. Intels GPU business is healthy. People can’t enough of them.
 
Last edited:
Curlyriff said:
I'm not upset or again? Just very confused to your ascertain of what Intel has in terms of GPU marketshare and how it works.
Click to expand...

Ah, you’re just confused. It’s not an ascertain, Intel really have 67% and 71% of the GPU and CPU market respectively. Intel are the primary manufacturer in both markets by a very long way.
 
Last edited:
jigger said:
Ah, you’re just confused. It’s not an ascertain, Intel really have 67% and 71% of the GPU and CPU market respectively. Intel are the primary manufacturer in both markets by a very long way.
Click to expand...
And what % of those systems that get read as having an igpu have a dgpu in there also? Because you need to take that percentage away as they clearly aren't used and not thus true market share. It's a falsehood of data analytics you are ignoring to make a point that just isn't true.
 
Curlyriff said:
And what % of those systems that get read as having an igpu have a dgpu in there also? Because you need to take that percentage away as they clearly aren't used and not thus true market share. It's a falsehood of data analytics you are ignoring to make a point that just isn't true.
Click to expand...

It’s all in the figures.

Intel 67%
AMD 15%
Nvidia 18%
 
humbug said:
You know why that says GPU market share: Intel 67%? Because the people who came up these statistics don't understand the thing they are making statistics about, and people pay for this crap.... :cry:

They are double counting CPU's with iGPU's in them, they count them once for the CPU and then again for the iGPU on that CPU.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom